ANATOLI BEDRITSKY

 

 

 

CRUSH OF USSR AND ROUT OF SOCIALISM

 

 

 

Translation from Russian into English

 

 

Copyright c 2005 by the author

Anatoli Bedritsky

 

 

 

2000 – 2010

 

Israel - USA

 

 

CONTENTS

1.         Stalin`s Socialism

2.         Degradation of Socialism in the USSR

3.         Desintegration of the USSR

4.    Forced Replacement of Socialism by Capitalism

5.         Totalitarianism and Democracy

6.         The Person, the State and the Globalisation

7.         Where Conducts Putinism?

8.         The Ukrainian Dilemma

9.         Nationalism and the State

10 Struggle of Civilizations

 

 

 

1. STALIN`S SOCIALISM

 

     From times immemorial humanity never had a social system, which would have been just for all people placed in various conditions deter­mined by the system. The economic system, defining the degree of the restriction on private property, from which depends the economic position of the person after his birth already and afterwards the degree of the inequality of the earning of the people, having or no having a capital.

    Capitalism is characterized by almost unlimited private property, when the rich receive enlarge its capital due to their capital and due to mercenary workmans and in smaller measure by its personal labour, which can be also very intellektual. The rich persons spend on the amuse­ments and material bells and whistles more money than they earn the personal labour. Poor people are not only among hired laborers, but also among those in small businesses and liberal professions. Among the poor one may meet people varying in their ability to survive. But even strong individuals can not always reach relative prosperity, or become rich, since many of them may undermine their health while try­ing to improve their living and fail to reach their goals. In the developed capitalist countries the poor are in the minority as compared to the well-off; this allows to the well-off to achieve majority in parliaments where they can pass the laws favorable to them. Capitalism does not know concept of "rightness" and the human rights to this, capitalism know only the right to an economic gain. In the developed capitalist countries the poor receive social security in order ensuring a living minimum in order to decrease the poor's discontent.

    The communism in the USSR was in an initial stage of development and referred to as socialism.  Socialism is characterized by the all-encompassing state property and only by a necessary private property, which in fact is personal property. The socialist motto is: "from everyone according to one's capacity, to everyone according to his work," due to this one receives a salary in proportion to one's work, with some deviations. The Motto of the commu­nism "from each as far as possible and each on need" not only is unfair, but also harmful, as workers will not be interested in work and it will lead to decline of economy. For this reason such communism is a utopia. The ideal motto of communism can be only "from everyone according to one's capacity, to everyone according to his work and of additional need".

      In the beginning of 20 centuries the majority of intellectuals of the Europe were adherents of social democracy on the basis of Marx's ideas, and many countries of the Europe were on the verge of revolution. In February, 1917 in Russia there was a revolution as a result of which tsar has refused authority in favour of parliament (constituent assembly). The parliament has passed democratic laws on equality of the rights of different people in Russia. The laws on nationalization of the ground, factories and factories have decided to consider after the ending of war. But the economic situation in the country worsened, due to that the workers and peasants did demand immediately to stop war and to carry out democratic reforms on nationalization of the capital. The Provisional government consisted in the majority of revolutionaries social democrats and esers, but bolsheviks there there was a minority.

The October revolution of 1917 have begun by Russian workers (proletariat) without leadership of known social democrats who considered that it is impossible to begin revolution in one Russia as she is doomed to a failure. Sinoviev and Kamenev even want to go to calm the people. But, Lenin has managed to convince the bolsheviks in necessity to head the revolution, which begun the proletariat. After October revolution  and Civil war Lenin has died and the authority has appeared at such strong personality as Stalin who has directed development of Russia on a way of the accelerated establishment of socialism.

     The economy of any state depends basically on genius of the head of the country. The USSR during Stalin's board became a superpower and continued to develop during Khruschev's board. It has occured not so the owing to Stalin's talent, but more the owing to socialist system. However, if Martov, Lenin or Trotsky would be in the head of authority instead of Stalin, the USSR would reach even greater successes as they were more fair and are not less talented in construction and protection of the Soviet state and besides they were loyal to existence of different fractions and parties. But when the authority has appeared at Stalin, he has constructed his socialism with repressing.

Lenin during his illness do not  firmly the successor, and has named only possible{probable} successors: Trotsky, Sinoviev, Kamenev, Buharin and Stalin, having specified their negative features. The worst characteristic was at Stalin, and therefore Lenin has suggested to not put his by the head of the party. Lenin knew Stalin best as Stalin was protege of Lenin. Trotsky from modesty has not proposed itself the head of a party. Trotsky was the strong personality which was against the Brest world but which has supported Lenin and together with Lenin has led Russia on a way of revolution to one country though before Trotsky was menchevik. Trotsky was commander-in-chief  of  the Red army during Civil war and herewith has managed to involve  on the party of bolsheviks the generals of imperial army. Without Trotsky, the bolsheviks in Civil war would suffer defeat. Lenin was not the military expert, and Stalin had experience only in an attack on bank.

Stalin, becoming the secretary general, increased number of  its supporters in the Central Committee of the party and together with Sinoviev has incited all the Political bureau against Trotsky. In 1927 Stalin by means of Sinoviev, Kamenev and Buharin has gained a political victory over Trotsky, has removed him from all posts and has sent into exile. In 1929 Stalin by means of Buharin has eliminated Siniviev and Kamenev from authority, and then Stalin has eliminated also Buharin from authority, because he has opposed Stalin's dictatorial authority. So, about ten years Stalin eliminated the competitors in the country leaders, due to that in this time the economic development of the country was  unsatisfactory.

From time of the revolution the peasants was obliged to do compulsory delivery of the foodstuffs necessary for the country. In 1921 was entered a new economic policy (NEP) at which the compulsory delivery was replaced on the foodstuffs tax, i.e. has been accepted the market . But, workers of cities could offer nothing to peasants instead of bread, why peasants have not been interested in increase in manufacture of agricultural production that has led to deterioration of maintenance of cities by the foodstuffs. In this connection in 1926 the government has started to plunder those people who were not proletarians.  Them have deprived the suffrages, their dwellings and all property. Children of those people lost the right to study in educational institutions and to have the qualified work. It was a crime of the government before the most vigorous and efficient part of people.

In 1930 have cancelled the NEP and have begun  collectivization in village and industrialization of the country. Because a failure of system of  foodstuffs tax and because of the begun compulsory collectivization the plan of preparation of grain was not carried out. In 1932-1933 power structures have started to take away violently bread from peasants as foodstuffs tax. Because of this in villages and small cities has begun famine. Ukraine has especially suffered. Stalin was guilty Of this tragedy as the main head of the state. Collectivization needed to be spent gradually, not touching an average layer of peasantry, and only to take  the earth from the large landowners.

     If Lenin has remained alive, Stalin could not seize power and development of socialism in the country has gone in other way by, without excessive violence over people. Trotsky and Lenin argued in essence and they reconciled with each other. Russia at socialist system become a superstate with her people and natural riches. But Russia and without revolution could become a superstate after overthrow of tsar.

     Since in the USSR there was an one-party system during long board of Brezhnev, which was been ill, the national economy has fallen into decay. Because of this the capitalism is more stabile than the socialism. The socialist system, as any other system, requires reforming for its constant development in accordance with changing life conditions. But there were no such reforms in the socialist state of the USSR and the states close to it, since they had a one-party system of power; under such a system there was no opportunity to choose a bet­ter way of socialist development. Since socialism had been established in the states with one-party dictatorship, this socialism did not develop and continued to be in an embryonic state. In principle, dictatorship is not an immanent feature of a socialist system, which is based of councils.

      Transition of Russia and other separate republics from socialism by capitalism was inexpedient. Improvement of development of economy of the state needed the accelerated reforming of socialism. Gorbachev has proclaimed the motto: « reorganization, publicity, acceleration ». But did not do reorganization, and has made only publicity that was advantageously for West and made advances to unreasonable democrats, having admitted them to authority. However, Gorbachev was not so silly that not to make out in the "unreasonable democrats", it he, probably, has followed on a criminal way at  assistance of a person who had communications with the West.

      The personal freedom of people was already at Chruschev and Brezhnev at a sufficient level the then. Experience has shown, that due to equality of people at socialism, the the people have requirements to the state about validity and equality, but about  this at capitalism the people even to think do not dare. Basically the socialist idea is more humane than capitalism which in general does not have idea, and only naked economic interest without pity to the workers. The socialist system is characterized by significant violence on individuality of the person, and without this violence the socialism is degraded, as the human harm always prevails of good. But, the violence of socialism should not be totalitarian, and democratic. Basically the socialism for the majority of people is better than capitalism.

 

 

      

2. DEGRADATION OF SOCIALISM IN THE USSR

 

   That the USSR less than for 50 years could become a superpower, testifies that socialist system is progressive. But, in conditions of one-party authority the head of the state should be clever enough and devoted to the state. When Brezhnev became leader, in USSR began the stagnation in economic development of the state and began the significant backlog of a standard of living of people in the USSR in comparison with a standard of living of people in the countries of the West. The people started to doubt in perspective of socialist system for development of the state. Change of authority was required, but she could not occur because of one-party authority in the state. In these conditions the representatives of authority have started to take itself special privileges in the form of special shops,  that caused the national protest. In fact laws to the USSR developed on principles of socialism, provided equality for all citizens. Representatives of authority in the USSR personally have not been interested in protection of Soviet system as they not had from this system significant privileges in comparison with other citizens of the country. And even, on the contrary, at destruction of this system they could receive a greater opportunity for enrichment than simple people, as has occurred during rule of Yeltsin. As a result extemporaneous chaotic transition from socialism to capitalism there appeared poverty because has suffered considerably of which a lot of people than during Stalin reprisals.

    The bomb for  undermining the Soviet system in the USSR was set up already in Brezhnev's time when he signed the Helsinki agreements developed by  investigation of the countries of the West. The majority of dissidents in USSR were not scientific analysts of social order, they did not have such works as at Marx, Plechanov, Lenin, Martov, Trotsky and other revolutionaries. And without development of such works it is impossible to create ideology for progressive development of the state.

      Overwhelming majority of people in the USSR have received education which they could not have in imperial Russia and of which have no the majority of people in the West. But intellect of soviet intellectuals was below than intellect of prerevolutionary intellectuals and they ruined the Soviet authority. The Soviet highbrows have not been able to understand the principle superiority of the socialism over capitalism. From these intellectuals appeared the dissidents. Idols of the Soviet intelligency actually became catalysts of disorder of the Soviet system, and then and the USSR. People can do mistakes at choice of idols.

   So, Solghenizin there was an embittered person on the Soviet authority and will go against her and consequently and against the majority of simple Soviet people which before acquaintance with him still not were so strongly are subject to dissident damage.  The Soviet authority basically arranged the people. The Soviet authority has not been imposed from the outside, this authority was established in the country basically with Russian people, and in struggle against enemies. In fact the white army basically was supported from abroad and not from Russian people . In the book "Archipelago Gulag" Solghenizin has gave a set of the facts from jails condemned, but he has not made the system analysis of these facts. The criminal actions of law-enforcement organ certainly took place, but this all has already stopped at the same Soviet authority and socialist system. So socialist system is not guilty of the breach of the laws, but guilty the government which necessary was change on new. Are guilty as well people, which against each other slandered. So, the prisoners spoke: " the people themselves each other eat". Probably, that Stalin had the insufficient information about work in law-enforcement organ. But, it is improbable, as an example for lawless behaviour of law-enforcement organ was unfair condemnation of Trotsky, Zinoviev, Bukharin, initiated by Stalin. Unfortunately, after cleanings Stalin does not remain outstanding figures of socialist ideology, and since 60th years the people has lost belief in socialism, and the communism was understood as a Utopia..

    Sakharov, using the popularity of the scientist, has wanted to influence accordingly on politics of the state under influence of friends-dissidents. Sakharov has shown painful vanity. He behaved impudently against the government, undermining his authority. States of the West skilfully used the unreasonable soviet dissidents. A part of dissidents were simply traitors. The Dissidents were so popular amongst people that they have influenced even among some members of the government. Actions of dissidents have so shaken the Soviet state system that it changed the soviet system and appeared two presidents Gorbachev and Yeltsin. Gorbachev in general could not be put the head of the state as he was with an obvious bad mark on a head. In ancient Israel the candidate on first prelate in Temple Jerusalem was checked on absence of defects of a body.

      Among dissidents in 70 and 80th years, as well as revolutions of 1917, was participating many Jews (but not prevailing). If Israel since 1947 would go on a socialist way of development, then Stalin would let out Jews from the USSR to Israel, where Jews could construct a good socialism on an example of kibuts. Then and the USSR would have a sample for the best socialism and not would have no dissidents. The USSR and Israel in the Near east could dominate, and the world would be other.

 

 

3. DESINTEGRATION OF THE USSR

 

  The disintegration of the USSR on separate republics has happened not on demand of parliaments of republics (except for Baltic), and has happened because Yeltsin was this advantageously. At this time in Moscow was a diarchy of two presidents: Gorbachev the president of the USSR and Yeltsin the president of the Russian Federation which among themselves conflicted for authority. In case of disintegration of the USSR on separate republics, Yeltsin remained one president of Russia. The disintegration of the USSR on the separate national states was certainly expedient, in such event each state was more responsible for the economic development, and not to live in account of the distribution from the center. The people of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus is more hardworking and therefore these republics especially did not counteract disintegration of the USSR, but they did not assume, that this three republics also will be divided. But only such full division arranged Yeltsin. By Yeltsin's example the head of Ukraine Kravchuk and the head of Belarus Shushkevich also have decided to be separated. Gorbachev as the head of the state knew and warned, that the partition of the USSR provoked by Yeltsin will lead to disorder of a national economy and accordingly to poverty of people. But heads of republics have not heeded Gorbachev's words, they wished to have authority without restrictions from Moscow.

    When Yeltsin has suppressed the attempt of members of government to dethronement Gorbachev, the demagogue Gorbachev has fallen into power of Yeltsin. After, Yeltsin and his accomplices in Belovezskaya puscha without the decision of parliaments of republics have signed there the agreement on transformation of all union republics in the independent states that was contrary to the will of people expressed in a referendum. After, Gorbachev has surrendered to Yeltsin, cowardly having signed the document on liquidation of the USSR and the post of the president. This was a treachery to his communist party and people of USSR. Gorbachev could and refuse to sign such paper on dissolution of the USSR because this was made not under the law. But Gorbachev was afraid of Yeltsin who then practically had already all authority.

    So Yeltsin to come to authority has destroyed from within the state USSR, having divided USSR on the separate states, contrary to the will of people expressed in a referendum. As a result of division of USSR Ukraine and Belarus have lost gas, oil and different minerals.But in fact without Ukraine and without Belarus, one Russia could not resist  fascist Germany and she would lose the control over her riches. But the Ukraine and Belarus also could not resist against Germany and have managed to protect itself owing to that that were together with Russia.

   The people has supported Yeltsin because of backlog of a standard of living in the USSR from a standard of living in the most developed capitalist countries that has happened basically during Brezhnev's board. And when at the head of authority became Gorbachev he instead of improvement of development of a national economy got busy to democratization of the country. As a result of publicity appeared the democrats who have started to speak at socialism the economic progress is impossible, but only at capitalism can be progress.

   The disintegration of the USSR could not have happened if Gorbachev had conducted the coun­try's democratization not under the influence of the West, but heeding of the national interests of the country. In Gorbachev's times Shevarnadze became the minister of foreign affairs;  and using the ruse of  democracy, he conducted a policy in the interests of the Western countries, and it might have hap­pened in exchange for a certain payment. Under Yeltsin, the foreign intelligence services by means of temptation could to influence not only on single politicians, but also on organizations like it was with indepen­dent television companies. But this is difficult to prove.

                             Probably, that at unofficial negotiations the group of Yeltsin with the heads of the basic republics has been made an agreement, according to which the nuclear weapon remains in Russia, and then has been decided to exempt Gorbachev from a unpleasant role of conciliation with the West and to transmit authority to Yeltsin, who on idea was an opponent of socialism and for coming to power was ready to destroy the USSR. For this purpose has been created illegal weak the government led by faceless Janayev. After that, Gorbachev has voluntary refused authority in favour of Yeltsin, who was under influence of democrats of westernized.

Yeltsin’s board has led to political, economic and cultural decline of the state. Democrats deluded the people, because the people can take a new ideology easily. But when the people realised the mistake, was already late. The parliament resisted to Yeltsin, but there the leaders were non-russian (one Chechen, and another half-jew though the hero of Soviet Union). Yeltsin was Russian  and that has helped him to win the parliament in 1994.

That that to authority Yeltsin has come is guilty certainly Gorbachev who had actually full authority in the state and he could cope with Yeltsin. In fact Gorbachev at all did not reckon with decisions of the Political bureau, and carried out an own policy. But, that to authority Gorbachev has come and did not concede this authority to more pragmatic politicians, the system of the government at which it was impossible to replace the unsuccessful head without putsch is guilty. Unsuccessful shy putsch led by Janayev possibly has been planned as a pretext for Yeltsin's subsequent putsch with its not clever democrats, the majority from which then regretted about Yeltsin's support. It is visible, that people this herd of people which requires the good owner.

The disintegration of the USSR occurred not in a constitutional way, but as a result of a putsch by democrats in the Forest of Belovezhskaya Pushcha. Due to this, the USSR was divided into single states not in a national-historical way, but according to the administrative borders in the USSR. Due to such a disintegration of the USSR, conflicts between the newly formed states emerged. The Mountain Karabakh aand the Trans-Dniester region did not agree to become part of Azerbaijan and Moldavia respectively, which earlier had only nominal authority over these territories, while the real source of authority was in Moscow. The Trans-Dniester region was only by administratively a part of the Moldavian republic, but practically there  always was populated basically by the  ukrainians, russians and jews. After disintegration of USSR, on this territory was formed by nobody unacknowledged Trans-Dniester republic. Considering that the majority of the population of this republic is the ukrainians, that this region is part of Ukraine.

    Before the USSR disintegration, the Mountain Karabakh pop­ulated mostly by the Armenians although was an administrative part of Azerbaijan, enjoyed the strong central authority by Moscow. After the collapse of the USSR, this territory should have become a part of Armenia, since due to historical reasons, the Armenians are unable to live under the Azerbaijani authorities, but this has not occurred. In independent Kazakstan the Kazaks were a minority as compared with the Russians, but power was seized by the Kazaks. As a result of the USSR disintegration, million of Russian refugees from the newly independent states appeared. But, Russia also has national problems because it consists not only Russians, who are Christians, but also other ethnic minorities, who are Muslims with autonomy. Creation of uniform people in this state is problematic. Therefore Ukraine, Poland, Belarus and other one-national states can develop more easily than Russia. But if all slavs peoples of central and east Europe will united in one federative state around ancient hail of the Kiev, that such state will be more stabile than the modern Russia with her Muslims.

Crash of socialism to the USSR and disintegration of the USSR has not been caused by such law of development of socialism, and has occured{happened} because of the certain factors, which is rather casual, as all life.

 

 

4. FORCED REPLACEMENT OF SOCIALISM BY CAPITALISM

 

When Yeltsin has come to power, he has destroyed socialist system and has established dictatorship of capitalism, which did by not skilled economists, such as unreasonable Gaydar (unworthy grandson of the nationally favourite grandfather Arcady Gaydar) and cruel Chubays, and also other antinational democrats. Attempt of people to stop approach of capitalism has been suppressed by tanks in October, 1994. As a result of transition from socialism to capitalism the majority of the Soviet people have turned in poor or needy; the number of alcoholics, addicts and criminals has over and over again increased. In it is the authority guilty which has made spontaneous transition to capitalism. As a result of privatization has suffered and has died many times more people than as a result of nationalization and collectivization. According to statement of main organiser of the transition to capitalism Chubays in Russia already irrevocably won capitalism. The new young generation any more does not know the valid life in the USSR. They believe the false and flattering disinformation, which broadcast the "independent" mass media. Full discredit of lifestyle of the Soviet people became fashionable. Especially in it the actors are zealous.

    The prominent analyst of the state formation in the USSR Zinoviev, dreamed about a "socialism with a human face," not rejecting socialism in favor of capitalism. In fact globalization of capitalism in the states of the Europe and America can worsen the life of the majority of people of wage labour and of small business will so, that they will be compelled to protest against existing capitalist system. Then people again will return to idea of socialism, will consider experience of socialism in the USSR and will construct true socialism with a multi-party system. The party of authorities on the choices can be changed, but socialism will remain, as under capitalism. It can happen by means of peace revolution which was applied by "democrats" in Russia and "orange" in Ukraine. At multi-party socialism there will be a true democracy which will be limited only by ten basic precepts of the God.

     Using power, Yeltsin and his clique forcibly replaced the socialist system of state with a capitalist one, without asking the opinion of the majority of the people, that is, without a referendum. Due to the rapid transition from socialism to capitalism, the economic situation of the state had worsened drastically, the morality of people also fell; wishing to enrich themselves, they began to compete "who is more a man" in imitating the American way of life in its worst form. A significant contribution to that was made by television that Yeltsin freed from any censorship restrictions and handed it over to crafty "democrats," who began to brainwash the people, giving him their the information with their arbitrary commentaries. The "democrats'" TV began to reflect their own interests and the interests of the mafia in the authority of the state, so the "democrats" became the so-called "fourth power," without a mandate on that.

     Thus, the real naive democrats were pushed into oblivion, and Yeltsin was under influence of cunning and the false demokrats, and because of this he has done government with people, which conducted an antinational policy, that could be only under the order on the part of other states. Only after the USA has made aggression against Yugoslavia, Yeltsin has understood a true policy of "democracy" and handed over his power to a sober person in order to correct his mistakes. The TV should be under the control of the parliament, otherwise, television can become a weapon used by dictatorship or criminal groups, or even hostile states.

After only 10-15 years after transition from a socialism by capitAfter only 10-15 years after transition from a socialism by alism in earlier prospering Ukraine many factories have broken up to the small enterprises or have turned to non-productive business, the buildings stood without repair, roads and sidewalks are broken, in streets have arisen much persons poor, which checked the contents of the boxes of garbage   over and over again at a day, but on a kind these beggars were normal people, impoverished at new authority.

 

 

5. TOTALITARIANISM AND DEMOCRACY

 

    The USSR almost from the very beginning was the socialist totalitarian state. During Stalin's board the totalitarian authority was not only disciplining (kept order under laws), but also criminal in relation to people of the country. The criminality of totalitarian authority consist that it{she} allowed this authority to make illegal actions{shares} against people. Apparently, lack of totalitarian authority is that at this authority it is impossible to exclude occurrence of illegal actions from the authority. The USSR almost from the very beginning was the socialist totalitarian state. During Stalin's board the totalitarian authority was simultaneously disciplining the people under law  and was criminal to the people of the country. The criminality of totalitarian authority consist in that, that she allow this authority to make illegal actions against people. Apparently, lack of totalitarian authority is that at this authority it is impossible to exclude occurrence of illegal actions of the authority.

    Dicta­torship could be established in any economic system. Upon the disinte­gration of the USSR into single states, and upon the latter's transition to capitalism, the power dictatorship did not decrease, but even increased. So, for instance, in 1991 in the socialist state of USSR, during the siege of the [Russian] White House where the people's idol Yeltsin stood, the power headed by Gorbachev has put out tanks, but did not use them, while in 1994 in capitalist Russia, when the people came out against Yeltsin in defense of the parliament, on Yeltsin's order the tanks not only shot at the parliament situated in the same White House, but also at the peo­ple that defended it. Yeltsin, the idol of democrats turned out to be an even harsher dictator, than Stalin and the Tsar, since Yeltsin forced the people to adopt a constitution, according to which he had the supreme authority.

    Soviet morality in relations between individuals was high even under undeveloped socialism. For instance, in the Soviet Union the authorities had no choice but to hide their activities that contradicted to Soviet morals. Unjust repressions seemed incongruous with Soviet morality, but it was a parallel phenomenon in the state. After the chief dictator Stalin died, the persecution of the innocent people did diminish considerably. When Khrushchev and later Gorbachev came to power, they tried to make the socialist system more human and democratic, but their mistake is that they should have acted gradually, because  west democracy not completely is fit for soviet socialist system. Khruschev was enough clever and he has stoped such realignment of the socialism. . And under Gorbachev as a result of glasnost occurred an explosive upsurge of the people's struggle for democracy, that has led to antipatriotism, to destabilization of the state and its disintegration.

     Some states can exist only at presence at them totalitarian authority. Such states are the Arabian countries and others. The totalitarian authority is necessary for Arabs by virtue of their mentality which has partly developed historically, and partly has genetic character. So, vainly Bush tries to impose democracy in Iraq. Probably, what even Russian people accepts in a greater measure the state with totalitarian authority.

    Even in the democratic states of the West and the USA the authority is totalitarian as she has an opportunity to do laws and decisions which in people are unpopular (for example, laws on an opportunity of migration of Asians and africans to the Europe, and also the decision on war in Iraq). If to lead a referendum under all laws it can appear, that many laws are totalitarian.

 

6. THE PERSON, THE STATE AND THE GLOBALISATION.

 

If the person is oppressed in the state of the birth for the national, religious or political reasons, this person has the right to leave this state and to enter in other state which agrees to  accepting him. At deterioration of conditions in the state, capitalists can freely to leave with the capital in other state, having left people of the state on an arbitrariness of destiny though this people worked on education of his capital.

Laws in the USA and in other capitalist countries, including in Russia, do not provide equality for all citizens, and are directed first of all on protection of interests of owners of the capital. The owners of the capital do not break these laws, but other less provided people compelled submissively to live under laws of the state. Under these laws people can improve their life by using of other people, not having remorses. Only to the most powerful owners of the capital, the globalization of economy on all world is favourable.

The globalization in economy leads to deterioration of food because of technogenic ways of their manufacture, because of increase in term of their storage and because of decomposition of natural products on their components for increase in assortment of products which are less qualitative. Qualitative products are replaced with genetically changed substitutes. The globalization leads to the increasing of economic dependence of the states from each other, to the increasing of migration of people and to spreading of  diseases. The globalization leads also to formation of uniform mankind which operate a small number of the richest people in the interests. As a result of globalization, the states become fictitious, and the people will under control of corporations with corporate police. Superfluous people will be without homes and to live on small social benefit, and will die out as they will not have conditions for continuations of birth.

Formation of uniform mankind will lead to disappearance of white human race and degradation of mankind. In fact the science is moved forward basically by representatives of white race; the representatives of other races in the basic successfully master the science and put her into practice.

   The God after Babylon has divided the uniform mankind into the separate peoples, that they were at enmity among themselves and developed itself by different ways for the best life and thus the best civilisations. The uniform mankind can be lost from distribution of different illnesses and even from one virus. Ancient Jews at will of God did not mix up with the people of the Boor. The modern mankind would not be that as now, if the homo sapiens would mix up with Neanderthal men, instead of have eaten them.

 

 

7. WHERE CONDUCTS PUTINISM ?

 

    Putin has started to correct the mistakes, which Yeltsin and his command has done in foreign policy of Russia. But to correct all mistakes was already late and impossible.  Putin has continued Yeltsin's way to capitalization of the country, unfairly clamping supporters of socialist development of the country. In fact privatization has been done illegally, because she could be spent only with the consent of all people through a referendum, but not on the basis of Yeltsin's decrees. In fact it was possible to only reorganize the state objects as the private companies, and these objects would become more effective and competitive than they became after privatization under direction of Gaydar, Chubays, etc. The public values have been taken from people and transferred to private possession for very little money. Under Putin it is partly corrected as possible, but already with costs.

   If Putin has executed expectations of the majority of people it should go on deprivatisation, to declare illegality of disintegration of the USSR, formally to declare, that the lawful border of Russia should be on border of the USSR and formally offer the states which have left the USSR to arrange their independence under the law of USSR, but not   on  the result of the putsch which was in Beloveg. At separation of the USSR it was necessary to leave only slavic republics in structure of new Russia, and the rest to suggest to be separated, but with a condition of participation in the economic union of the CIS and participation in military political Warsaw contract while there is a NATO.

Putin does the state national policy so, that has strengthened a vertical of the power and kept Russia as the Euroasian empire consisting of the different people, having the autonomy in the territory. Such empire is monogamma empire unlike gamma empire which is the USA. In the USA the people of a different ethnic origin are mixed in all territory and consequently association of any ethnic group for struggle for the independence there is complicated. The European states, before peace invasion the Asians, were basically the monoethnic states, due to that they almost did not have big internal national contradictions, except for fascism in Germany. But in those states where there have another compact national groups, as Basques in Spain and Irish in Great Britain, are there struggle for national independence.

Modern Russia is much less than imperial Russia and than the USSR, but more homogeneous. People of the majority of the national autonomies making Russia, it white race as well as Russian that reduces antagonism possibility between them. The mordovs or the Tatars it is difficult to distinguish from the Russians. But, religious distinction creates not smaller contradictions than racial distinction. The people concerning different races, have different mentality. The religion is a superficial peel, but if necessary it can change and serve as the weapon.

As the increase in number of the European population in Russia is problematic, Putin has allowed to build the Euroasian empire, giving the Russian citizenship to Asians and even Africans. These foreigners are settled in all cities of Russia. In the USSR, as well as in imperial Russia, national minorities lived basically in the independent regions and their resettlement has been limited by a residence permit. Free moving of foreigners among Russians can lead to the same interethnic antagonism which was formed in the Western Europe (the French syndrome).

As the increase in number of the European population in Russia is problematic, Putin has started to build the Euroasian empire, giving the Russian citizenship to Asians. These foreigners are lived in all cities of Russia, unlike the radical ethnic nationalities living mainly in their autonomous regions of Russia. Such moving of foreigners in Russia can lead to the same interethnic antagonism which was formed in the Western Europe (the French syndrome). As the majority of Asians and the Africans moving to Europe, it more from the negroid race, but Europeans is the white race, then aspiration афроазиатов to live among Europeans is contrary to desire of the last it is  a racial violence, and it is actually racism. Liberal antiracist laws in the European countries and in Russia are actually racist in relation to the radical white people. Actions of skinheads it is natural display of the protest against penetration and joining of people of other race to the stabile people. As skinheads are not legalised, they cannot develop the ideology and influence a state policy, and only illegal acts they have an effect. Russia should be guided not to be the Euroasian empire which was at the imperial power and at the Soviet power, but on revival of the Kievian Russia as empires, without connecting itself with the peoples from Caucas.

The Russian people living abroad, should have the unobstructed right to homecoming to Russia. As an exception, the same right should be for the Jews, as they in Russia had no autonomy (in the Biribidzhan the Jews did not live) and they have left Russia against the will, them have simply forced out to Israel. But the role of Israel come to the end.

The structure of Russia includes not only Slavs, but also Turks, which descendants of Khazars and Tatars.   Kagan Joseph in its letter has specified, that the Khazars are descendants of Togarma, which is a grandson of Japheth in a family tree of people according to Torah. Descendants of turks of the Volga region, are appreciably presented in Tatars, Mordovs, Bashkirs, Buryats, Kalmyks and other people. Descendants of Togarmah are mentioned in prophecy of Ezekiel according to which in the end days (which are already close) the God will punish peoples of Meshech, Tubal and Togarmah (peoples of Turks of mongoloid posterities of Japheth), and also the peoplesof Paras (Iran), Cush and Put (negroid peoples of Ham).

These peoples under Gogh's leadership will be at war against people of Israel in which can live not only descendants of a knee Judas, but also representatives of 10 knees of Israel. Descendants of 10 knees of Israel represent those orthodox Christians which have become related with Jews and have moved to live to Israel. In fact during when the Scythians was in the western Asia, the 10 knees of Israel which was in the Mussel and Syria have adjoined to Scythians and have appeared in the Europe where having mixed up with the Scythians. Thus the 10 knees of Israel  have appeared not only in structure of Slavs, but also in structure of other peoples of the Europe after Great resettlement of people.

"And you Son of Human (Messiah) prophesy about Gog Gog and saythus said the Lord God: it I your god, you Gog chief prince of Meshech and Tubal. I shall lift you from distant north and I will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel. I also shall beat the bow out of thy left hand and  will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand. Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured. And I will send a fire on Magog (peoples supporting Gog), and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the God. (Ezekiel 39:1-6).

From Putin's plan is not clearly, whether there will be Russia empire together with descendants Togarmah and will involved in war against people Divine, or will be separated from turkis for construction of new Russia together with Ukraine and Belarus. If Russia will go on the way of the strengthening of the Euroasian empire, then after a while the president of the country can become a Tatar. Then the nuclear button of one of the greatest the states with rockets and the nuclear weapon will be in hands of Islamites.

 

  

8. THE  UKRAINIAN  DILEMMA.

 

Between ukrainians and russians occurs disputes who in a greater measure are Slavs from of the Kievian Russia. And whence there are Slavs is little known. About Slavs interesting data are stated in old-time book "Vles", which has found Isenbek in Ukraine in 1919. In book "Vles" it is specified, that "Goths and Slavs originally lived overseas and behind mountins in green land of seven rivers". This land probably represents a lower reaches of the river Ganges in India. "There live Bogumir, from which have occurred Slavs". Goths and Slavs have left from India and came to Black sea in 1300 till life of Germanrich, i.e. in 9 centary up to AD. Goths "on white horses have passed trough the Iranian mountains, but Slavs have done trough Entre Rios and Suria". Therefore, "having come from green land to Black sea, Slavs have come across there on is ready, which blocked to them a way and Slavs battled for those earth". The Slavic tribes, Goths and Huns "were at war with each other for the earth on both parties of the river Don from mountains Russian (Cau­casian) up to mountains Karpat". Apparently, Slavs and Scythians it is same people, since at this  time  they have appeared in Black Sea Coast. "The river Volga separates us from other tribes". "After of Bogumir was Oriy. Oriy was live 1500 up to Dier". If to take into account, that Dier was live in 9 centary, Oriy was live in 6 century up to AD. “The Huns have begun the big war to win the Earth and they have gone to Russia". "Eguns  begins a big war for formation of the earth and they have gone to Russia". Considering, that the eguns have begun the war before it when in year 672 up to AD the  kimmers and  the east Scythians have left Black Sea Coast and have entered in the south possession of empire Assur, then it is the most probable, that they have made it under a pressure of eguns. In year 613  up to AD the Midia and Babylon have won Assyria, then Scythians have returned to the East Europe, where represent the east Slavs, whom the Greeks have named Russians.

In 7 century the khazars have come to the Europe from Near-Caspian steppes of Asia and they formed The Khazar state, reached from Volga up to Danube including northern Caucasus and Crimea. Thus, in 8 century Slavs lived in the neighbourhood near khazars and paid  them a tribute for protection from pechenegs. Khasars were at war against arabs and did not allow them to promote to the Europe. Under the certificate of arabs, a part of khazars were light and strong. And a part of khazars were dark as hindus and less strong. They spoke by different dialects of turkic language, but understood each other. According to the letter of kagan Joseph, the majority of khazars were the turks from Togarma, grandson of Jafe, which is patriarch of turks and mongols. The khazars were pagans, but after formation of the The  state there  have appeared many Christians, moslems and people of  judaism. In 730 year the ruling people of Khazar state has accepted judaism. But, the Judaic people of Khazar no had a relation to the European Jews, as the Judaic people of Khazar have come from Iran and they are the descendants of babylonians mixed with Jews which were in captivity after falling the First Temple in Jerusalem. These Judaic people are more similar to arabs than on Jews. The European Jews were surprised to existence of these Judaic people .

In year 964 the Russian prince Svjatoslav has released{exempted} Slavs from a tribute for Khazar, and in year 964 Russian have crushed khazar capital Itil on Volga, then the  Khazar state has broken up. But, the khazars  do not leave their earth, and have remained to live on the places. Only the Khorezm soldiers leave the place and have left to Khoresm. The  khazar Judaic people of Itil also leave to Khoresm where  represents Bukhara Judaic people. The  khazar Judaic people of Kiev have remained to live in Kiev together with Khazars and Slavs.

  After disintegration of Khazar state, steppe people have begun attacks on Slavs . Then Slavs have addressed for the help to Vikings and the Vikings princes have created the Kievian Russia. Southern Russian tribes differed from northern Russian tribes in spite of the fact that they basically had general ancient Russian. In the south was living also part of Khazars  near with Slavs.  In the Kievian Russia lived also Jews, to what that fact testifies, that one of four gate of Kiev have named as a Jewish gate. In 1125 after Vladimir Monomaha's death, disintegration of Russia has begun. Northern Vladimir-Suzdal the princedom has started to be at enmity with a southern Kiev princedom. They were united with polovs at attacks against each other. The polovs even were on constant military service in Russian princedoms, and due to that a significant part of Polovs could mix with Russians.

At the Tatar -Mongolian invasion in 1239 the Kiev princedom and other southern Russian princedoms have been crushed and become a part of Golden Horde. At authority of Golden Horde, Russian people of Kiev and other southern cities suffered violence from Tatars and  moved in northern Russian princedoms which were not in structure of Golden Horde but only paid them tribute.

As Kiev, Volhynia and Galichina together with the steppe Khasars and another turkis were in structure of Golden Horde, then in these places the Russians and the steppe turkis under authority of Tatars were mixed with each other and changed the language. So, in the time of 300 years of the Tatar-Mongolian board on southern part of former Kievian Russia was formed a new people with the Ukrainian language. The most typical primordial Ukrainian words occur from Turkic languages. That fact, that annals of the Kievian Russia are written in Russian, but not in the Ukrainian language, testifies that the Ukrainian language and accordingly Ukrainian people could be generated only during Golden Horde, and not earlier.

In Ukraine the Christian belief was kept, as the Tatar-Mongolians during their conquests were pagans and were tolerantly to different religions. Only in 1313 the  Golden Horde have accepted an islam, but it was not reflected in people, which had the religion. If the khasar people in structure of the Kievian Russia have not adopted the Christian belief from Slavs, then now the Ukrainian people would be similar to Tatars, to Kazakhs and to peoples of northern Caucasus, which accepted islam during Golden Horde. Judean people of the Kievian Russia during the Tatar-Mongolian invasion have been partially kill, and have partially mixed with Russia people.

     Prince Danilo of Ukrainian princedom Galichina in 1259 acknowledge authority of Tatars and to approach with them. And in time of his son Lion (1264-1301) the Ukrainians of Galichina even were at war together with Tatars against Poles. In 1340 Lithuania has seized east Volhynia. Poland in the alliance with Tatars in 1349 have seized the Galichina and the western Volhynia. And before that, Lithuania in 1340 have seized east Volhynia and for economic development of this territory Poles have invited skilled people  from Germany among which there were basically Jews. Jews rented the earth which belonged to Poles, and Ukrainians were hired as farm laborers. For two centuries Jews were much  multiplied in Poland and in Ukraine. (So the Jews was multiplied in Egypt). The European Jews in Ukraine were descendants of the Jews expelled by Romans from Judea. These Jews ethnically very differed from Khazar Judaic people.

In Year 1569 Poland and Lithuania were united and thus all western part of former Kievian Russia together with the city of Kiev has appeared in authority of Poland and the Polish feudal lords have started to dominate over peasants, transforming the peasants in dependent farm laborers. At that time the majority of the population of the western part of former Kievian Russia, which were under authority of Poles, talked in the Ukrainian language, but named itself Russians, and the Poles have named them Ukrainians. The majority of Ukrainians fiercely hated Poles, but still any more did not love Jews, with whom the Ukrainians was communicated directly and except this the Jews more differed on exterior and culture from Ukrainians.

        Being under oppression of the Polish feudal lords, Ukrainians have started to run therefrom in steppe farther where Dnepr, where they have mixed with same Ukrainians and have created ther Zaporozhye Cech. There the Ukrainians have mixed also with different Turkic peoples. Then they began to represent itself the Ukrainian people unlike the Russian people. Kuchma if him to paraphrase has written correctly: Ukrainians it not Russians. It is interesting, that  the majority of Ukrainian surnames differ from the Russian surnames. But at princes of Kievian and of Galichian  princedoms the surname were Russian. Many Russian surnames varied on Ukrainian during board of cossack hetmans in Ukraine. In fact at reception of new people in cossacks of their surname varied on original surnames which became the prototype of the Ukrainian surnames.

     In 1648 the ukrainian cossacks led by hetman Bogdan Khmelnitskiy have begun war against Poles, but in this war the kossacks more kills defenseless Jews. But Khmelnitskiy could not achieve the independence for ukrainians from Poland and therefore he in 1654 has established the union with Moscow, having received some autonomy for Zaporozhye Cech. The Zaporozhye Cech protected southern boundaries of Russia from attacks of the Tatars and the Turk. Since 1699 the Left side of Dnepr in Ukraine was a part of Russia, but the authority was of the Ukrainian hetman. The Right side of Dnepr in Ukraine, though has remained in structure of Poland, but there reigned anarchy. In 1768 in Right-Ukraine the gaidamaks (Ukrainian peasants) have lifted bloody revolt against the Polish sovereignty. The gaidamaks differed pathological hatred to Jews, killing it without exception the whole settlements of Jews, and then killing the Poles. There, where were gaidamaks, does not remain any alive soul. Russia has helped Poland to suppress this revolt that it has not extended to all Ukraine. If the Ukrainian did not kill the Jews, in Ukraine could be more the Jews than the Ukrainians.

    The Zaporozhye Sesh became a refuge for gaidamaks. After Russia has subdued the Crimea, has disappeared the necessity in Zaporozhye Cech and Ekaterina II in 1775 liquidated the Zaporozhye Cech. As a result of this, Russia has deprived the east Ukraine the remainder of its independence. In 1795 after partition of Poland between Russia, Austria and Prussia, the West Ukraine also has passed in structure of Russia, i.e. there was a reunion of east and western parts of the Ukraine. After that the imperial authority of Russia has started to russify the Ukraine.

    Before the revolution of 1917 in Ukraine in the big cities talked mainly in Russian, which was the general state language for all Russia, including Ukraine and Belarus. The intelligency of the people of these three countries has brought the general contribution to development of general literary Russian. Modern Russian already considerably differs from that Russian on which talked in an antiquity in the Kievian Russia, but he is much closer to him than the Ukrainian language. It is remarkable, that all inhabitants of villages and villages talk exclusively in the Ukrainian language, and inhabitants of cities talk mainly in Russian. Probably, it has appeared and result of the russification spent in imperial Russia.

In 1917 during revolution has been proclaimed the Ukrainian republicá in which Petlyura became military minister. In 1918 and 1919 Petlyura's army was at war against bolsheviks.  Petlyura was the organizer of terrible Jewish pogroms in Kiev both other cities and places of Ukraine. But, in fact the Ukrainians are Christians and they  must know that it is big sin to kill Jews, for they people Divine. Due to it the God during long time did not give an opportunity Ukrainians to be the independent state.  

     During short-term authority of the Ukrainian Directoria headed by Petlyura and Vinnichenko, has begun the ukrainisazia of the Ukraine. And after an establishment of the Soviet authority in Ukraine the communists still have more strengthened the ukrainisazia of Ukraine according to national politics of Stalin. In 1925 the Main ukrainisator of Ukraine was Kaganovich, which more than all other has differed in the ukrainisazia of  Ukraine. He punished the people, which could not speak  ukrainian  language on the work.  But, after this the Soviet authority corrected excesses in the ukrainisazia, because such ukrainisazia disturbs to the industrialization, and due to  that the general state Russian was necessary.  But the development of the Ukrainian language in Ukraine proceeded. Just during the Soviet period linguists have created uniform literary Ukrainian language.

But the Ukrainians of the western Ukraine, being under authority of Poland, had no opportunity to preserve in purity and to develop the language: as Poland pursued a policy to conversion of the Ukrainians in Poles. In the western Ukraine the Ukrainian language became a Russian-Polish dialect (surghik), which the western Ukrainians spreads in all Ukraine through transatlantic educational seminars. The people of Western Ukraine actually do polonisazia of the Ukraine.

    After the transformation the Ukrainian republic to independent Ukraine, the national consciousness of the ukrainian people became more strong and beside them appeared a strong national patriotism. Citizens of Ukraine have started to be interested in history of Ukrainian people and to depart from from cultural influence of Russia. The mass media has received the freedom and begun under the order to form a new mentality of people under the influence of the western consumer culture. Under influence of the West there was also propagation on reduction of a role of the USSR in a victory over fascist Germany and to glorification of a role of the countries of the West. The history of the folks of east Europe was adulterated.

    Before the disintegration of the USSR the Ukraine was as Russia, and there was no distinction between ukrainians and russians. Distinction was only in a nationality specified in the passport, but on it  nobody paid no regard.  Even the western Ukraine attached to USSR very quickly at the Soviet authority became such as all Ukraine. But, for this purpose it was necessary to pacify the insurgents of Bandera.

   After disintegration of the USSR, Kuchma did concessions to politicians of the western Ukraine which have decided to take the authority and to alter the people of all Ukraine on their udeology, by means of transatlantic sponsors. Policy Kuchmmy has resulted not only in occurrence of antagonism between people of the western and east Ukraine, but also to an impoverishment of all people of Ukraine as a result of the admitted capitalisazion of the national economies. The Kuchma's board has led " to orange revolution", and as a result to foreign intervention and to unconstitutional capture of authority by westernized politicians , which in the further are not measured to give back the authority, having an opportunity to do results of elections at their desire.

    The Ukrainian republic was formed accidentally owing to revolution which has begun in Russia in 1917 and has strongly developed owing to stay in composition of the USSR. In Ukrainian SSR lived basically ukrainians, russians and jews. These three peoples have brought the greatest contribution to economic and cultural development of the Ukrainian republic and protected the country from hitlerite Germany. The Ukrainians and the Jews on a par with Russians still earlier, being in structure of imperial Russia, were participated  and perished in all wars of the Russia, protecting the general{common} Russian state and have conquered new countries, including the Crimea. Therefore all these three peoples: Ukrainians, Russians and Jews are peoples, which have formed the state of Ukraine. The part of Jews, Russians and Ukrainians has left for Israel at will of the God, and at will of the God can return when the existing state Israel will not be.

The western Ukraine has been exempted and attached to already existing Ukrainian republic in USSR of the owing to Stalin's persevering position in this. In such multinational country as the USSR Stalin has resolved an ethnic question in favour of all ethnic peoples, instead of Russian people. If the tsarist imperial Russia, where the Ukraine had not an autonomy, did not change in USSR, today in Ukraine not be Ukrainians, they became russified.

      Crimea has been attached to Russia in 1771 and never was a part of hetman Ukraine. The government of the USSR at Khruschev has taken the Crimea from the Russian republic for the Ukrainian republic as indemnification for big losses of people of Ukraine in war against fascist Germany. In fact if people of Ukraine not do resistance of fascist Germany Russia could become a colony of Germany. But, transfer of Crimea to the Ukrainian republic was possible only in conditions of the USSR where there were no actual borders between republics. The partition of the USSR occured on legal borders between republics. But, the partition between Russia and Ukraine has not occured completely on legal borders. As Crimea and Sevastopol were important for Russia, then between Russia and Ukraine as exception has been made the Big contract about the status of Crimea and Sevastopol. This contract also stipulates friendship between Russia and Ukraine. But when the attitudes between Russia and Ukraine became unfriendly this contract loses force, and in this case the status of an belonging of Crimea and Sevastopol becomes disputable. The Russians and the Ukrainians could not earlier even present to themselves, that the attitudes between them so will deteriorate as a result of active actions of the Ukrainian chauvinists. But, in fact Russia has satisfied the expectations of ukrainian nationalists.

       Before the war against fascist Germany more than half of population of Crimea were Russians. Except for Russians there lived Ukrainians, Byelorussians, Crimean Tatars, Jews, Germans, Greeks, Karaims, etc. Between Russians, Ukrainians and Byelorussians almost there was no distinction and they together   is more than 70 percent of the population of Crimea, but the Crimean Tatars is less than 20 percent of the population.

      The government of the USSR during rule of Gorbachev had no enough bases for decision-making of returning the Tatars to the Crimea, whence their deport during the Second world war. Resettlement of Tatars and other peoples was one of results of the Second world war. The Tatars and earlier had no autonomy in Crimea and these Tatars unlike other peoples of Ukraine did not protect this earth from Germans during the Second world war. But, there is an autonomous republic Tatarstan in structure of Russia, which could at desire to integrate other Tatars of the same Muslim belief.

    After transformation of the Ukrainian republic to the independent Ukraine the big influence on internal and foreign policy of the state have done the ukrainians of the western Ukraine at support the ukrainians, living in the USA and other countries. Their purpose to completely ukrainisazia of the Ukraine is patriotic, in this case the state can develop more successfully. But it is necessary to consider, that one third of the population of Ukraine is Russians and if to consider the intermarriages is half of the citizens of Ukraine are russian-speaking, which have the same rights in Ukraine as the ukrainian-speaking.

    History very inexact science, and in view of falsification  it is even more difficult to find true history of mankind. to learn{find out} historical true. Therefore, it is difficult to Ukrainian nationalists to prove, that the Ukrainian people and the Russian people ethnically two different people, especially after that that the Ukraine more than 300 years was in structure of Russia, where the Ukraine was not dependent but influential in the state. To unite people in a state it is difficult how to separate them, why in Ukraine can be again руина. Only the God can resolve a dilemma of Ukraine. Only the  God knows the past of people and with considering of it defines the future of people. The Ukrainian people during the existence repeatedly opposed the God, exterminating people of Israel which is people of the God. German people only once has made it and has received on a merit, but in all other times and now German people is friendly to Jews. From medieval Spain and other countries of the Europe of Jews were expelled, but did not were  killed. To Jews has been intended by the God till some time to wander on the Earth.

The life of each person and people occurs as a result of a choice of good and ill, except for Jewish people as a whole. But for influence on the life of mankind as a whole, the God influences on the life of separate people of different peoples. To change the life of Jews in the future the God has influenced Brezhnev's government which has decided to send Jews to Israel. Herewith is remained vacant the workplaces and apartments. The God has influenced also on Jews who started to have such national pain, that they have started by mass to go in Israel, though the Zion idea existed and earlier.

But hardly, the God will leave Russian Jews on the earth promised, as they have already executed messianic act at will of the God. The government of Israel from the beginning of the existence broke a precept of the God who has forbidden mixture of Jews with surrounding Hamitic (black) people. The government of Israel has brought not only the Moroccan arabs, but even negros from Ethiopia to Israel, having recognized they as Jews. Because of such national policy the state of Israel can receive punishment from the God, due to that the Jews will have to return on the Russian Native land. But the USSR already is not present. Probably the God prepares a place in former territory of the USSR for the Russian Jews, where they  live more than 500 years as radical people together with Russians, Poles and Ukrainians. This place the central part of Ukraine, including Volhynia. In that case in  the Kievian Russia the Jews and the Ukrainians again will live together and to build socialism, but not such as were before, but  better, If the Ukrainians at time of hetmans did not destroy Jews, then on this Earth could become a New Israel.

 

 

9. NATIONALISM AND THE STATE

 

    The national device of the state is the most important factor on which the unity of citizens of the state depends. The state is the most stable, if it is basically one-national, as for example Germany, France, Poland. The state also is stable, if it national  miscellaneous, but is strongly mixed, as for example the USA.  Owing to national-socialism Germany was reached tremendous successes in the development, but had defeat because of dictatorship of the one-party system led fascism at which the nationalism was distorted and became a part of fascism. The main mistake of fascist nationalists of Germany is that, that they killed the people of the God and therefore have received the deserved defeat. The Jewish question in Germany and in other states of the Europe was possible to solve their voluntary resettlement in the earth of Israel (Palestin) as it was planned in Germany earlier, instead of to kill them. In fascist Germany the ideology of nationalism has been perverted. It is peculiar to nationalism only isolation of the  nation and at respect for other nations, but the nationalists of fascist Germany tried to do the nation above other nations by means of their conquest.

Basically the ideology of nationalism is humane, as she is based on natural feeling of affinity between representatives of given people and feeling of alienation to representatives of other  peoples. Representatives of people of different races differ not only culture of development, but the main in appearance. The majority of white people are perceived by more beautiful in comparison with color people not so because of color of the skin, how many because of more beautiful features of the face and the body. For this reason the color persons in a greater measure try to mixing with the white people, than on the contrary. Suppression of natural feeling of nationalism of people in the Europe leads to mixture of European people with Asian and African people and it leads to genetic change of people of the Europe. Therefore the care of nationalists about preservation of their nation is humane.

 Theory Maltus is humane also, as she provides restriction of increase in number of mankind for preservation of this mankind as the Earth has the limited vital resources. Restriction of a population cannot be carried out by means of the international quotas. It should occur natural by, but for this purpose the mankind should moderate the humanism, i.e. it is less help to people which uncontrolledly increase in comparison with more intellectual people. The humanism and democracy lead in a greater measure to a harm than to good.

    If the state is multinational, i.e. consists of the different peoples differing ethnically (national) or is religious, then between these different peoples there are contradictions, and in this case the persons. who have the greatest national feelings, begin an struggle for national preservation of their people, what is possible at national branch. If the government strong, it can suppress the nationalists demanding independence, what was in the USSR at Stalin and as occurs in the Great Britain, Spain and in др. The states. If the government weak, the the  contradictions increase and can become so irreconcilable, that the state breaks up to the separate national states what has occured at introduction of democracy in the USSR and Yugoslavia. But Yugoslavia, unlike the USSR consisted of related slavic people, except for Albanians. National disintegration of Yugoslavia has occured in a smaller measure because of spiritual incompatibility of people, but in a greater measure because of foreign intervention for easing of the slavic state in the central Europe.

   Dudaev's actions aimed at separating Chechnya from Russia seemed to be not only futile, but also crazy, since there was no vital necessity for that.   In addition, there was also discord between the ruling clans. The complicating of the Chechen question occurred because the stand of Russian politicians and TV anchorpersons who then supported politi­cally the Chechen separatists. I am not sure that these politicians acted out of their democratic convictions, rather they acted in the economic and geopolitical interests of foreign countries, that is they were traitors for a certain fee, as was possible during Yeltsin's reign. The people of Chechnya was drawn into an attrition war against great Russia, which could end in the total genocide of the Chechen people. Now virtually all the Chechen men fight Russians, either openly or in the underground. And the youth is inculcated with the idea of continuing the war. One should give its due to the bravery of the Chechen people who had born the war's disasters for such a long time. The deserve independence even only for that. But the problem is that other nations in the Caucasus should also be granted independence, or the conflict will not cease, there is no other choice. If Russia wishes to remain a great power, it should bring to order other national autonomies located in the center of Russia and warn them against trying to repeat the Chechnya option. But see­ing what happened to Chechnya, they would be unwilling to follow its example.

Russian people is main people which has based and forms the state of Russia. Therefore only representatives of Russian people should be define thenational policy of this state, i.e. to define what persons of which peoples it is possible to take and to give  the citizenship of the state.

Ancient Egypt also had the problem of nationalities, after the Jews multiplied there, who settled with the Pharaoh's permission. But when the Jews began to multiply too wide, the new Pharaoh said: Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we: “Come on, let us deal wisely with them, lest they multiply, and it come to pass, that, when there falleth any war, they join also unto our enemies, and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land” (Exod. 1:9, 10). So the Pharaoh resolved this problem by evicting Jews from Egypt. But it was done upon God's will, that Jews could bless all peoples of the earth.

    The USA is a multiethnic state, in which different ethnic groups live intermixed over the whole of the territory of the state and none of them could be made to live in a separate state. On territory of  USA were annihilated the base population, and so the USA became a state, where the miscellaneous people  find the sanctum because of the persecution of them in the other states, as in ancient Israel, where one city was a refuge for criminals.  But in­termarriages between different races are rare; due to that, contradictions between different ethnic groups may grow acute anytime. Taking into account that the separation of humanity into races has occurred by God's will, there exist natural indisposition of one race toward another. The arti­ficial intermixing of races carried out by the state in schools and other public places is a violation of natural feelings of people; it could be called race violence. As it is seen, in USA is broken the Divine right of each person  to not mingle with the other folk and race. The Propaganda of the american lifestyle with forming a interrasial humanity has no future, since it contradicts the will of the God, which has separated the mankind on folks and on races forever. The Policy of the mix peoples, which present the miscellaneous races, is a genocide. So, the peoples of the Lithuania, Latvias and Estonia do correctly, that they do not want to mingle with the other peoples, and the democratic ideals can not change their feeling, mortgaged from God.

    According to Noah`s Covenant (see sec.3-5), said by him on behalf of the God, the Hamites must live under power of Semites and Japhethes. But if take into account that this was already realized in timeses of servitude and colonialism, that the Hamites have already suffered its punishment from Noah and therefore at present all peoples and all races already are equal, but must live separately.

    The only exception among all the nations of the world is the Jewish people, which appeared upon God's will in order to improve the morality of humankind. Although the Jews differ from the title nations among which they live, they are never opponents of these nations. For instance, the Jews who are citizens of France, Germany, Russia, or other states are spiritually more French or German or Russian than even the native representatives of these nations. This is characteristic of the people of God. But a Tatar, Kalmuk or Chuvash cannot be called Russian as long as these nations have autonomies and have not mixed up genetically with Russians.

    The state can exist, if it can provide defensibility from external and internal enemies. The existence of empire, unlike the one-national states, have a threat not only from the external enemies, but also from the internal enemies. The state is empire if in him people of one nationality dominates over people of other nationalities which are a part of this state.

Imperial Russia was empire, the USSR in the beginning was the union of the states, and then became empire owing to Stalin's dictatorship. Modern Russia is the depressive empire saved only owing to possession by a more potential of the nuclear weapon, differently she would be broken off on pieces by external enemies. The USA is specific empire in which representatives of different people are mixed, where any people cannot dominate over other people. Thus there is a violence over white people which are compelled to communicate with representatives of other people, what not for all satisfies.

People of nation represent a generality of people which do not divide itself on an ethnic origin. The ethnic origin of men is defined on their genetic haplogroup. Usually the people of nation consist of the people having a different ethnic origin, i.e. having different haplogroups, but mixed among themselves so that they among themselves not can by divided on nationality.

So, for example the slavic people (Russian, Ukrainians, Byelorussians, Poles and others) consist approximately half from representatives slavic гаплогруппы R1a, and half from representatives of others гаплогрупп I-20%, N1c-16%, etc. Greeks consist of representatives гаплогрупп E1b1b1a-27%, J2-25%, R1a-12%, R1b-12%, I2a-10%, etc. Jews consist of representatives гаплогрупп J1-25%, J2-10%, E1b1b1*-22%, E1b1b1c-10%, R1a-10%, R1b-10%, etc.

 

 

10. FAIRNESS BETWEEN STATES AND STRUGGLE BETWEEN CIVILIZATIONS.

 

 

Mutual relations between the states or blocks of the states, unlike mutual relations between people of one state, are established in favour of stronger, instead of on fairness. In relations between the states the concept of fairness is ignored, because the state-winner do not judge. Each state makes how to him favourably if in the head of the state there are no traitors or liberals. The USSR before threat of an attack of fascist Germany acted in the international policy so, to own advantage as far as possible, to avoid war with the strong fascist monster. For this purpose the USSR even has concluded the nonaggression pact with Germany (pact Molotov-Ribbentrop), because with England and France it was not possible to make the military union. Stalin's actions thus were correct as he was not neither the traitor nor the liberal. Also makes England, France and Poland, which since Munich were guilty in strengthening fascist Germany. Each state searched for more favourable ally. The same history repeats and now. Nobody is not interested  to have the union with the weakened Russia. All former union republics not only have turned away from Russia, but also spoil to her. The human world is such, the God has made mankind such and not could to alter it.

Whether successful was the experiment of the God on improvement of morals of mankind through assimilation of mankind in posterity of Abraham? The answer will turn out dual as assimilation occured on two lines from two descendants of Abraham. Jews were the descendants Jacob (Israel) and they have influenced almost on all Semitic (Europeoid) peoples through assimilation and christianity.  Arabs were the descendants Ishmael and they have influenced in a greater measure on a part Hamitic (Negroid) peoples and on a part Japhetic (Mongoloid) peoples through assimilation and islam. But the majority Hamitic and Japhetic peoples have not changed since the ancient times. The Christian civilization has changed and actually became a godless western civilization, which does not resist to absorption by a civilization of  islam. Japhetic China represents a separate civilization.

European peoples not only have improved the morals, having accepted christianity, but also developed more dynamically and became a basis of a world civilization. It explain in that, that the European peoples in the greatest measure assimilated with Jews, who have occured actually not from Abraham and Sarah but from Angels Divine and Sarah as Sarah was already old and only from the Angel Divine she could conceive and give birth Isaac to father Jakob of the ancestor of Jews. From Abraham and hamitic Hagar was born Ishmael, which the ancestor of arabs, which civilization considerably differs from a civilization of Jews and European peoples.

To the beginning of 21 centuries the peoples have approached informatively, but not spiritually. Informative rapproachement of people, technical progress and globalization of the capital have led to occurrence from the environment of different very rich people, which struggle for terrestrial resources and for hegemony of their morals for authority above all mankind. These richest people determine authority in the states and they represent a special fourth global civilization, which mixes the basic three civilizations.

The human world should remain a miscellaneous, as it was made by the God after division of the human into descendants Shem, Ham and Japheth. But, when the globalistes as a result of cold war have achieved disorder of a superpower of the USSR,  remained other superpower of the USA, which tries to correct the mankind, mixing the peoples of different races. But any state has no right to dominate over peoples of all Earth. It is function of the God. When the leader of the strongest black Hamitic people Nimrod during construction of the Babel tower wished to make it to not worship to the God, then the God  do division of the mankind into separate peoples and has disseminated them on the Earth. If actions of a superpower will contradict to the will of the God, then will come Apocalypse, described by John.