Content

1. Socialism phenomenon

2. Degradation of socialism in the USSR

3. Totalitarianism and democracy

4. Globalization of mankind

5. Unknown putinism

6.The Ukrainian dilemma

7.Armageddon and God`s right hand

1. SOCIALISM PHENOMENON

�� From times immemorial humanity never had a social system, which would have been just for all people placed in various conditions deter�mined by the system. The economic system, defining the degree of the restriction on private property, from which depends the economic position of the person after his birth already and afterwards the degree of the inequality of the earning of the people, having or no having a capital.

�� Capitalism is characterized by almost unlimited private property, when the rich receive enlarge its capital due to their capital and due to mercenary workmans and in smaller measure by its personal labour, which can be also very intellektual. The rich persons spend on the amuse�ments and material bells and whistles more money than they earn the personal labour. Poor people are not only among hired laborers, but also among those in small businesses and liberal professions. Among the poor one may meet people varying in their ability to survive. But even strong individuals can not always reach relative prosperity, or become rich, since many of them may undermine their health while try�ing to improve their living and fail to reach their goals. In the developed capitalist countries the poor are in the minority as compared to the well-off; this allows to the well-off to achieve majority in parliaments where they can pass the laws favorable to them. Capitalism does not know concept of "rightness" and the human rights to this, capitalism know only the right to an economic gain. In the developed capitalist countries the poor receive social security in order ensuring a living minimum in order to decrease the poor's discontent.

�� The communism in the USSR was in an initial stage of development and referred to as socialism. �Socialism is characterized by the all-encompassing state property and only by a necessary private property, which in fact is personal property. The socialist motto is: "from everyone according to one's capacity, to everyone according to his work," due to this one receives a salary in proportion to one's work, with some deviations. The Motto of the commu�nism "from each as far as possible and each on need" not only is unfair, but also harmful, as workers will not be interested in work and it will lead to decline of economy. For this reason such communism is a utopia. The ideal motto of communism can be only "from everyone according to one's capacity, to everyone according to his work and of additional need".

�� In the beginning of 20 centuries the majority of intellectuals of the Europe were adherents of social democracy on the basis of Marx's ideas, and many countries of the Europe were on the verge of revolution. In February, 1917 in Russia there was a revolution as a result of which tsar has refused authority in favour of parliament (constituent assembly). The parliament has passed democratic laws on equality of the rights of different people in Russia. The laws on nationalization of the ground, factories and factories have decided to consider after the ending of war. But the economic situation in the country worsened, due to that the workers and peasants did demand immediately to stop war and to carry out democratic reforms on nationalization of the capital. The Provisional government consisted in the majority of revolutionaries social democrats and esers, but bolsheviks there there was a minority.

The October revolution of 1917 have begun by Russian workers (proletariat) without leadership of known social democrats who considered that it is impossible to begin revolution in one Russia as she is doomed to a failure. Sinoviev and Kamenev even want to go to calm the people. But, Lenin has managed to convince the bolsheviks in necessity to head the revolution, which begun the proletariat. After October revolution� and Civil war Lenin has died and the authority has appeared at such strong personality as Stalin who has directed development of Russia on a way of the accelerated establishment of socialism.

�� The economy of any state depends basically on genius of the head of the country. The USSR during Stalin's board became a superpower and continued to develop during Khruschev's board. It has occured not so the owing to Stalin's talent, but more the owing to socialist system. However, if Martov, Lenin or Trotsky would be in the head of authority instead of Stalin, the USSR would reach even greater successes as they were more fair and are not less talented in construction and protection of the Soviet state and besides they were loyal to existence of different fractions and parties. But when the authority has appeared at Stalin, he has constructed his socialism with repressing.

Lenin during his illness do not� firmly the successor, and has named only possible{probable} successors: Trotsky, Sinoviev, Kamenev, Buharin and Stalin, having specified their negative features. The worst characteristic was at Stalin, and therefore Lenin has suggested to not put his by the head of the party. Lenin knew Stalin best as Stalin was protege of Lenin. Trotsky from modesty has not proposed itself the head of a party. Trotsky was the strong personality which was against the Brest world but which has supported Lenin and together with Lenin has led Russia on a way of revolution to one country though before Trotsky was menchevik. Trotsky was commander-in-chief� of� the Red army during Civil war and herewith has managed to involve� on the party of bolsheviks the generals of imperial army. Without Trotsky, the bolsheviks in Civil war would suffer defeat. Lenin was not the military expert, and Stalin had experience only in an attack on bank.

Stalin, becoming the secretary general, increased number of� its supporters in the Central Committee of the party and together with Sinoviev has incited all the Political bureau against Trotsky. In 1927 Stalin by means of Sinoviev, Kamenev and Buharin has gained a political victory over Trotsky, has removed him from all posts and has sent into exile. In 1929 Stalin by means of Buharin has eliminated Siniviev and Kamenev from authority, and then Stalin has eliminated also Buharin from authority, because he has opposed Stalin's dictatorial authority. So, about ten years Stalin eliminated the competitors in the country leaders, due to that in this time the economic development of the country was� unsatisfactory.

From time of the revolution the peasants was obliged to do compulsory delivery of the foodstuffs necessary for the country. In 1921 was entered a new economic policy (NEP) at which the compulsory delivery was replaced on the foodstuffs tax, i.e. has been accepted the market . But, workers of cities could offer nothing to peasants instead of bread, why peasants have not been interested in increase in manufacture of agricultural production that has led to deterioration of maintenance of cities by the foodstuffs. In this connection in 1926 the government has started to plunder those people who were not proletarians.� Them have deprived the suffrages, their dwellings and all property. Children of those people lost the right to study in educational institutions and to have the qualified work. It was a crime of the government before the most vigorous and efficient part of people.

In 1930 have cancelled the NEP and have begun� collectivization in village and industrialization of the country. Because a failure of system of� foodstuffs tax and because of the begun compulsory collectivization the plan of preparation of grain was not carried out. In 1932-1933 power structures have started to take away violently bread from peasants as foodstuffs tax. Because of this in villages and small cities has begun famine. Ukraine has especially suffered. Stalin was guilty Of this tragedy as the main head of the state. Collectivization needed to be spent gradually, not touching an average layer of peasantry, and only to take� the earth from the large landowners.

�� If Lenin has remained alive, Stalin could not seize power and development of socialism in the country has gone in other way by, without excessive violence over people. Trotsky and Lenin argued in essence and they reconciled with each other. Russia at socialist system become a superstate with her people and natural riches. But Russia and without revolution could become a superstate after overthrow of tsar.

� ��Since in the USSR there was an one-party system during long board of Brezhnev, which was been ill, the national economy has fallen into decay. Because of this the capitalism is more stabile than the socialism. The socialist system, as any other system, requires reforming for its constant development in accordance with changing life conditions. But there were no such reforms in the socialist state of the USSR and the states close to it, since they had a one-party system of power; under such a system there was no opportunity to choose a bet�ter way of socialist development. Since socialism had been established in the states with one-party dictatorship, this socialism did not develop and continued to be in an embryonic state. In principle, dictatorship is not an immanent feature of a socialist system, which is based of councils.

�� Transition of Russia and other separate republics from socialism by capitalism was inexpedient. Improvement of development of economy of the state needed the accelerated reforming of socialism. Gorbachev has proclaimed the motto: � reorganization, publicity, acceleration �. But did not do reorganization, and has made only publicity that was advantageously for West and made advances to unreasonable democrats, having admitted them to authority. However, Gorbachev was not so silly that not to make out "unreasonable democrats", but it is a criminal way of treachery of ideas of a socialism which he should protect.

�� The personal freedom of people was already at Chruschev and Brezhnev at a sufficient level the then. Experience has shown, that due to equality of people at socialism, the the people have requirements to the state about validity and equality, but about this at capitalism the people even to think do not dare. Basically the socialist idea is more humane than capitalism which in general does not have idea, and only naked economic interest without pity to the workers. The socialist system is characterized by significant violence on individuality of the person, and without this violence the socialism is degraded, as the human harm always prevails of good. But the violence of socialism should not be totalitarian, and democratic. Basically the socialism for the majority of people is better than capitalism.

� ��

�� 2. DEGRADATION OF SOCIALISM IN THE USSR

�� That the USSR less than for 50 years could become a superpower, testifies that socialist system is progressive. But, in conditions of one-party authority the head of the state should be clever enough and devoted to the state. When Brezhnev became leader, in USSR began the stagnation in economic development of the state and began the significant backlog of a standard of living of people in the USSR in comparison with a standard of living of people in the countries of the West. The people started to doubt in perspective of socialist system for development of the state. Change of authority was required, but she could not occur because of one-party authority in the state. In these conditions the representatives of authority have started to take itself special privileges in the form of special shops, that caused the national protest. In fact laws to the USSR developed on principles of socialism, provided equality for all citizens. Representatives of authority in the USSR personally have not been interested in protection of Soviet system as they not had from this system significant privileges in comparison with other citizens of the country. And even, on the contrary, at destruction of this system they could receive a greater opportunity for enrichment than simple people, as has occurred during rule of Yeltsin. As a result extemporaneous chaotic transition from socialism to capitalism there appeared poverty because has suffered considerably of which a lot of people than during Stalin reprisals.

�� The bomb for undermining the Soviet system in the USSR was set up already in Brezhnev's time when he signed the Helsinki agreements developed by investigation of the countries of the West. The majority of dissidents in USSR were not scientific analysts of social order, they did not have such works as at Marx, Plechanov, Lenin, Martov, Trotsky and other revolutionaries. And without development of such works it is impossible to create ideology for progressive development of the state.

�� Overwhelming majority of people in the USSR have received education which they could not have in imperial Russia and of which have no the majority of people in the West. But intellect of soviet intellectuals was below than intellect of prerevolutionary intellectuals and they ruined the Soviet authority. The Soviet highbrows have not been able to understand the principle superiority of the socialism over capitalism. From these intellectuals appeared the dissidents. Idols of the Soviet intelligency actually became catalysts of disorder of the Soviet system, and then and the USSR. People can do mistakes at choice of idols.

�� So, the analytical thinking and literary genius Solzhenitsyn do not pull on the Nobel Prize, but it give for other merits. Solzhenitsyn, left the conclusion, was embittered, has risen against the Soviet power, and consequently and against the majority of simple Soviet people, which before acquaintance with it have not been so strongly subject yet to dissident damage, the Soviet power basically suited them. Solzhenitsyn before condemnation was the normal Soviet person, but with inquisitive mind, thanks to that he saw the lacks of the Soviet power, but did not protest. Probably that the prison has cracked his, he there was under of influence of political prisoners and began to revenge, having overstepped the limits of judiciousness.

�� The Soviet power has not been imposed by the outside, this power was established in the country in the core by the Russian people. But the white army received an help from abroad. In the book "Archipelago Gulag" of Solzhenitsyn has stated set of the criminal facts from law enforcement bodies to the condemned. But it is all has already stopped at the same Soviet power and the socialist system after Stalin. So the socialist system is not guilty. Lawless of law enforcement began from the company of unfair condemnation trotskism, initiated by Stalin. Are guilty as well people which against each other slandered. One former prisoner has told, "people have each other eaten." Nature of the person is imperfect. The Gulag was an anachronism of the Soviet power because of the absence of the valid power of Councils. After Stalin reprisals does not remain outstanding figures of socialist ideology and in the late seventies the people have lost faith in a socialism, and the communism was understood as a utopia.

�� Sakharov, using the popularity of the scientist, has wanted to influence accordingly on politics of the state under influence of friends-dissidents. As wife Saharov was the dissident, then she could have on him an special influence. Sakharov behaved impudently against the government, undermining his authority. States of the West skilfully used the unreasonable soviet dissidents. A part of dissidents were simply traitors.

The Dissidents were so popular amongst people that they have influenced even among some members of the government. Actions of dissidents have so shaken the Soviet state system that it changed the soviet system and appeared two presidents Gorbachev and Yeltsin. Gorbachev in general could not be put the head of the state as he was with an obvious bad mark on a head. In ancient Israel the candidate on first prelate in Temple Jerusalem was checked on absence of defects of a body.

�� Among dissidents in 70 and 80th years, as well as revolutions of 1917, was participating many Jews (but not prevailing). If Israel since 1947 would go on a socialist way of development, then Stalin would let out Jews from the USSR to Israel, where Jews could construct a good socialism on an example of kibuts. Then and the USSR would have a sample for the best socialism and not would have no dissidents. The USSR and Israel in the Near east could dominate, and the world would be other.

�� 3. TOTALITARIANISM AND DEMOCRACY

�� The USSR almost from the very beginning was the socialist totalitarian state. During Stalin's board the totalitarian authority was not only disciplining (kept order under laws), but also criminal in relation to people of the country. The criminality of totalitarian authority consist that it{she} allowed this authority to make illegal actions{shares} against people. Apparently, lack of totalitarian authority is that at this authority it is impossible to exclude occurrence of illegal actions from the authority. The USSR almost from the very beginning was the socialist totalitarian state. During Stalin's board the totalitarian authority was simultaneously disciplining the people under law� and was criminal to the people of the country. The criminality of totalitarian authority consist in that, that she allow this authority to make illegal actions against people. Apparently, lack of totalitarian authority is that at this authority it is impossible to exclude occurrence of illegal actions of the authority.

�� Dicta�torship could be established in any economic system. Upon the disinte�gration of the USSR into single states, and upon the latter's transition to capitalism, the power dictatorship did not decrease, but even increased. So, for instance, in 1991 in the socialist state of USSR, during the siege of the [Russian] White House where the people's idol Yeltsin stood, the power headed by Gorbachev has put out tanks, but did not use them, while in 1993 in capitalist Russia, when the people came out against Yeltsin in defense of the parliament, on Yeltsin's order the tanks not only shot at the parliament situated in the same White House, but also at the peo�ple that defended it. Yeltsin, the idol of democrats turned out to be an even harsher dictator, than Stalin and the Tsar, since Yeltsin forced the people to adopt a constitution, according to which he had the supreme authority.

�� Soviet morality in relations between individuals was high even under undeveloped socialism. For instance, in the Soviet Union the authorities had no choice but to hide their activities that contradicted to Soviet morals. Unjust repressions seemed incongruous with Soviet morality, but it was a parallel phenomenon in the state. After the chief dictator Stalin died, the persecution of the innocent people did diminish considerably. When Khrushchev and later Gorbachev came to power, they tried to make the socialist system more human and democratic, but their mistake is that they should have acted gradually, because west democracy not completely is fit for soviet socialist system. Khruschev was enough clever and he has stoped such realignment of the socialism. And under Gorbachev as a result of glasnost occurred an explosive upsurge of the people's struggle for democracy, that has led to antipatriotism, to destabilization of the state and its disintegration.

�� Some states can exist only at presence at them totalitarian authority. Such states are the Arabian countries and others. The totalitarian authority is necessary for Arabs by virtue of their mentality which has partly developed historically, and partly has genetic character. So, vainly Bush tries to impose democracy in Iraq. Probably, what even Russian people accepts in a greater measure the state with totalitarian authority.

�� Even in the democratic states of the West and the USA the authority is totalitarian as she has an opportunity to do laws and decisions which in people are unpopular (for example, laws on an opportunity of migration of Asians and africans to the Europe, and also the decision on war in Iraq). If to lead a referendum under all laws it can appear, that many laws are totalitarian. As Russian people have more wont to freedom, and accordingly more disobedient, than people of the West.

�� 4. GLOBALIZATION OF MANKIND

�� If the person is oppressed in the state of the birth for the national, religious or political reasons, this person has the right to leave this state and to enter in other state which agrees to accepting him. But, it is absolutely unacceptable, if at deterioration of conditions in the state, capitalists can freely to leave with the capital in other state, having left people of the state on an arbitrariness of destiny though this people worked on education of his capital.

Laws in the USA and in other capitalist countries, including in Russia, do not provide equality for all citizens, and are directed first of all on protection of interests of owners of the capital. The owners of the capital do not break these laws, but other less provided people compelled submissively to live under laws of the state. Under these laws people can improve their life by using of other people, not having remorses. Only to the most powerful owners of the capital, the globalization of economy on all world is favourable.

The globalization in economy leads to deterioration of food because of technogenic ways of their manufacture, because of increase in term of their storage and because of decomposition of natural products on their components for increase in assortment of products which are less qualitative. Qualitative products are replaced with genetically changed substitutes.

�� Globalization leads to increase in economic dependence of the states from each other, to increase in migration of people and accordingly to increasing of infectious diseases, and also to formation of general� mankind which operate a small number of the richest people in their interests. As a result of globalization the states become fictitious, The corporation with corporate police will operate on the peoples. Superfluous people will be the homeless and to live on pity grants at the best, and will die out as they will not have conditions for reproduction. At globalization the world financial and economic structure supervise the industrial manufacture and the foodstuff of all states, having made unprofitable the manufacture in different states. China now practically supplies all states with the industrial goods necessary in the life. In case of participation of China in world war the mankind will lose the vital goods. And after all earlier all states existed basically thanks to their manufacture. It is a pity that now no Soviet Union which was provided itself independently and where people lived without reflecting on the future. At globalization continuation, an ending of mankind is inevitable, as there is no reserve mankind (a peoples, living irrespective of other peoples).

�� Formation of uniform mankind will lead to disappearance of white human race and degradation of mankind. In fact the science is moved forward basically by representatives of white race; the representatives of other races in the basic successfully master the science and put her into practice. The God after Babylon has divided the uniform mankind into the separate peoples, that they were at enmity among themselves and developed itself by different ways for the best life and thus the best civilizations. The uniform mankind can be lost from distribution of different illnesses and even from one virus. Ancient Jews at will of God did not mix up with the people of Cham. The modern mankind would not be that as now, if the homo sapiens would mix up with Neanderthal men, instead of have eaten them. Europeans should not eat Africans and Asians, but to be separated from them should, yet not late.

�� 5. UNKNOWN PUTINISM

�� Putin has started to correct the mistakes, which Yeltsin and his command has done in foreign policy of Russia. But to correct all mistakes was already late and impossible.� Putin has continued Yeltsin's way to capitalization of the country, unfairly clamping supporters of socialist development of the country. In fact privatization has been done illegally, because she could be spent only with the consent of all people through a referendum, but not on the basis of Yeltsin's decrees. In fact it was possible to only reorganize the state objects as the private companies, and these objects would become more effective and competitive than they became after privatization under direction of Gaydar, Chubays, etc. The public values have been taken from people and transferred to private possession for very little money.

�� If Putin has executed expectations of the majority of people it should go on deprivatisation, to declare illegality of disintegration of the USSR, formally to declare, that the lawful border of Russia should be on border of the USSR and formally offer the states which have left the USSR to arrange their independence under the law of USSR, but not�� on� the result of the putsch which was in Beloveg. At separation of the USSR it was necessary to leave only slavic republics in structure of new Russia, and the rest to suggest to be separated, but with a condition of participation in the economic union of the CIS and participation in military political Warsaw contract while there is a NATO.

Putin does the state national policy so, that has strengthened a vertical of the power and kept Russia as the Euroasian empire consisting of the different people, having the autonomy in the territory. Such empire is monogamma empire unlike gamma empire which is the USA. In the USA the people of a different ethnic origin are mixed in all territory and consequently association of any ethnic group for struggle for the independence there is complicated. The European states, before peace invasion the Asians, were basically the monoethnic states, due to that they almost did not have big internal national contradictions. But in those states where there have another compact national groups, as Basques in Spain and Irish in Great Britain, are there struggle for national independence.

The further declaration of independence to national republics is inadmissible, as it threatens the existence of Russia as the states. Modern Russia is much less than imperial Russia and than the USSR, but more homogeneous by nationality. The people concerning different races, have different mentality. But, religious distinction can cause not smaller contradictions than racial distinction. The religion is a superficial peel, but if necessary it can amplify and serve as the weapon. As Russian people are the state-forming, then in� Russia needs to strengthen Orthodoxy and not to strengthening of other religious faiths up to prohibition those. Earlier the religion was spread by fire and a sword, now it is inappropriate. But it is possible to promote by granting of economic or other benefits to transition in the Orthodoxy of Christianity, as for example some pass in Islam because of the polygamy resolved there. In Russia the Orthodoxy should not be separated from the state as it was earlier, tsars it understood. But Orthodoxy can be reformed.

�� Russia should have a purpose of revival of the Kievian Russia as empires, without connecting itself bonds with the people of Caucas,� which mentality differs from Slavs. Ukraine, Belarus and Russia should unite with center in Kiev. The islam and other peoples of� the Volga region need to be integrated into slavic empire. The Mordvins or the Tatars is difficult for distinguishing from Russians.

�� The Russian people living abroad, should have the right to returning to Russia by help of the state. Russian Jews, as they in the USSR had no autonomy (Birobidzhan they did not recognize) should have the same right, because they have left from Russia at will of the God. After of that the Russian Jews by means of Russia at will Divine will change the policy of Israel and will make its a Jewish state, corresponding Precept of the God.

�� As construction of slavic empire is problematic, Putin has allowed to build the Euroasian empire, giving the Russian citizenship to Asians and even Africans. These foreigners are settled in all cities of Russia. In the USSR, as well as in imperial Russia, national minorities lived basically in the independent regions and their resettlement has been limited by a residence permit. Free moving of foreigners among Russian can lead to the same interethnic antagonism which was formed in the Western Europe (the French syndrome).

�� People differ basically on races, instead of on the peoples. The majority of Russians, Ukrainians, Byelorussians, Germans, Frenchmen, Swedes, Italians and other European people do not differ almost from each other and they easily can make one of peoples if will appear in one state where will talk in one language. So, in imperial Russia almost there was no difference between Russian, Ukrainians and Byelorussians. Even intellectuals of Poland, Lithuania and Bessarabia have joined Russian culture and it would lead make to general Russian people. But, it was stoped with formation of the USSR, because of the Stalin national policy of formation� of national autonomies. In spite of the fact that the north caucasian people (Chechens, Daghestanis, Ossetins, Abkhasians, etc.) for a long time are in structure of Russia and outwardly they do not differ almost from Europeans, their mentality differs from the European people and it does not change. Different mentalities have the right to existence, but to mix them sometimes is inexpedient.

�� Natural uniformity and heterogeneity of people can be checked up on experiment if to collect unfamiliar 11 persons of a different nationality (the Russian, the Ukrainian, the Byelorussian, the Lithuanian, the Jew, the Tatar, the Chechen, the Kazakh, the Uzbek, the Azerbaijanian and the Ethiopian) and to offer it, without talking with each other, to choose to itself the person to pair for joint residing. Steams are formed if two persons have chosen each other, and the remained continue a choice among themselves and it proceeds some times. There is no doubt that the first 4 persons from the listed will prefer to choose each other and also the Jew, the Tatar and Chechen as they outwardly do not differ almost. But the Kalmyk, the Kazakh, the Uzbek and the Azerbaijanian should fraternize among themselves. Undoubtedly that the superfluous there will be an Ethiopian. So, it as Jews spoke, beat not under the passport, but on the physiognomy.

�� Division of the people into the different peoples and races has occurred at will of God. Liberal antiracist laws in the European countries and in Russia are violence in relation to the radical white people. Actions of skinheads are natural, they are patriots of the people. The skinheads struggle for preservation of white race. The ideology of modern democrats and intellectuals in historical prospect is immoral.

�� Among peoples of Russia except of Russians there are many Turkis who represent basically descendants of Chazars and Tatar-Mongols.� Kagan Joseph in its letter has specified, that the Khazars are descendants of Togarmah, which is a grandson of Japheth in a family tree of people according to Torah. Descendants of turks of the Volga region, are appreciably presented in Tatars, Mordovs, Bashkirs, Buryats, Kalmyks and other people. Descendants of Togarmah are mentioned in prophecy of Ezekiel according to which in the end days (which are already close) the God will punish peoples of Meshech, Tubal and Togarmah (peoples of Turks of mongoloid posterities of Japheth), and also the peoplesof Paras (Iran), Cush and Put (negroid peoples of Ham). These peoples under Gogh's leadership will be at war against the people of Israel. Considering it, it is quite probable that at that time the people of Togarmah will separate from Russia and will adjoin Islam peoples.

In Israel live not only descendants of a tribe Judas, but also representatives of 10 tribes of Israel, which representatives of 10 tribes of Israel. Descendants of 10 tribes of Israel represent those orthodox Christians which have become related with Jews and have moved to live to Israel. In fact during when the Scythians was in the western Asia, the 10 tribes of Israel which was in the Mussel and Syria have adjoined to Scythians and have appeared in the Europe where having mixed up with the Scythians. Thus the 10 tribes of Israel have appeared not only in structure of Slavs, but also in structure of other peoples of the Europe after Great resettlement of people.

"And you Son of Human (Messiah) prophesy about Gog Gog and saythus said the Lord God: it I your god, you Gog chief prince of Meshech and Tubal. I shall lift you from distant north and I will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel. I also shall beat the bow out of thy left hand and� will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand. Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured. And I will send a fire on Magog (peoples supporting Gog), and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the God. (Ezekiel 39:1-6).

From Putin's plan is not clearly, whether there will be Russia empire together with descendants Togarmah and will involved in war against people Divine, or will be separated from turkis for construction of new Russia together with Ukraine and Belarus. If Russia will go on the way of the strengthening of the Euroasian empire, then after a while the president of the country can become a Tatar. Then the nuclear button of one of the greatest the states with rockets and the nuclear weapon will be in hands of Islamites.

6. THE UKRAINIAN DILEMMA

�� Between Ukrainians of Ukraine and Russians of Russia are disputes are conducted who occurs from Slavs of Kievan Rus' to a large extent. But from whom occur Slavs of in general little it is known. About Slavs the interesting data are stated in the "Vlesovy book", which found A. Izenbek in Ukraine in 1919. According to this book, "Gotha and Slavs originally lived overseas after mountains in the green Edge of Entre Rios (it is the most probable in India). "Bogumir was a forefather of Slavs and from his sons there are northerners and rusa". Goths and Slavs left Entre Rios and came to the Black Sea. There was it for 1300 before to Germanarikh", i.e. in the 9th century BC (Germanarikh at the head of ostgot was at war against Huns in 370). "After of Bogumir there was Oriy with the sons. Oriy lived for 1500�� to Deere". If to consider that Deere lived in the 9th century AD, having made in 866 an a military campaign on Zargrad, then Oriy lived in the 6th century BC. "The river Ra (Volga) separates us from other people. Eguna (different Asian people) started big war for formation of the earth and they went to Russia". Considering that in 672 BC, Cimmerians and east Scythians left Black Sea Coast and moved the South in possession of the Assyrian empire, they left Black Sea Coast under the pressure of egun, i.e. Slavs and Scythians are the same people.

In 613 BC. The mussel and Babylon conquered Assyria, from which the Scythians were returning to Eastern Europe,� where they will represent east Slavs, whom Greeks called them rus. "Goths on white horses went by the Iranian mountains from the lower reach of the Ganges River in India), but Slavs left them and went through Mesopotamia (Entre Rios in Babylon) and Syria. Having come from the green edge to the sea Gothic (Black sea), we (Slavs) came across there on Goths, which blocked a way to us, and we battled for those lands and for our life. There was a fight great for crops on both sides of Don to mountains of Russians (Caucasian) and to pastures Carpathian".

Khazars who formed Khazar Khanate stretching from Volga to Danube including the North Caucasus and the Crimea came to the same time in the 7th century to Europe from Caspian steppes of Asia. Thus, in the 8th century the Slavs lived to the north of Khazars and rendered them tribute. Khazars resisted to a pressure of Arabs to Europe. Khazars consisted of different tribes which lived independently, but common language was Turkic. According to Iosif Kagan's letter, Khazars were the Turkic peoples occurring from Togarma of the grandson Yafet of the ancestor of Mongoloids and Turkic peoples. And, according to Arabs, the Khazars soldiers were white and was looked as athletes. And a part of Khazars were dark as Hindus.

�� Khazars were pagans, but in Khazar Khanate was also many Christians, Muslims and Jews. In 730 the ruling clique of Khazar Khanate accepted Judaism. Khazar Jews could be descendants of the captivated Jews after destruction of the First Jerusalem Temple by Babylonians and a part of the Jews running to Asia Minor after destruction of the Second Jerusalem Temple by Romans. Khazar Jews had no communication with the European Jews. The European Jews were surprised to existence of Khazar Jews.

�� Khazars were in good relations with Slavs. Khazars though took a tribute from the southern Slavs, but without violence, kind of for protection of Slavs against attacks of Pechenegs and others. Slavs were even involved in military operations of Khazars. The southern Slavs so mixed up with Khazars that the Khazar city of Kiev by 850 became actually Slavic. In 882 the Novgorod prince Oleg occupied this city and made it the capital of Russia. In 965 the Russians headed by the prince Svyatoslav crushed the Khazar capital of Itil on Volga, then Khazar Khanate broke up. Association of different Slavic tribes to the state of Russia and weakening of Khazar Khanate happened at the same time. Weakening of Khazar Khanate was accelerated, because of discrepancy of interests of Judaic governors and other people.

�� After disintegration of Khazar Khanate most of Khazars did not leave anywhere as Russians were not for them irreconcilable enemies, but were their allies in wars, besides this a part of Khazars were white as Slavs. Most of Khazars remained to live in Kiev and other parts of Russia on places together with Slavs where they assimilated with them by then most of Khazars were peasants, who grew up grain and other food. Because of mixture of Khazars with Ukrainians there was Ukrainian in which there are a lot of Turkic words.

�� The Jews of Khazar Khanate, having communication with the Russians, could assimilate partially among them. Khazar military elite from Itil together with the rest of soldiers went to Khorezm. There Khazars of Judaic belief began to represent the Bukhara Jews who in the majority mixed up with Uzbeks and Tajiks. Khazar Jews of the Caucasus it is nowadays Tates, who are called also Mountain Jews. The Khazar Jews of the Crimea it is nowadays Krymchaks. In the Crimea there are also Karaites who have no relation to Khazars, they as ashkenaz descendants ancient Jews, but differ from them by that, that they recognize only the Torah, and Mishna and the Talmud reject.

�� Because of mixture with Khazars and other people the Russian tribes among themselves differed a little in spite of the fact that they in principle had common Old Russian language. The distinction of the Russian tribes among themselves is confirmed also by the fact that the Kiev principality and other southern Russian principalities in the Ipatyevsky chronicle of 1187 are called Ukraine. In 1125 after Vladimir Monomakh's death the disintegration of Russia began. The northern Vladimir-Suzdal principality began to be at enmity with the southern Kiev principality. At the Tatar-Mongolian invasion in 1239 the Kiev principality and other southern Russian principalities were crushed and were a part of the Golden Horde. At the of the power of the Golden Horde, Russians of Kiev and other southern cities, because of violence of Tatars, move to other Russian principalities, which were only dependent and rendered tribute. The prince Danilo ruling in the Russian principality Galicia in 1259 also had to recognize the power of Tatars. At the prince the Lion (1264-1301) the people of Galichina were at war together with Tatars against Poles.

�� During of the Golden Horde the communication between Russians of different territories decreased, and language was respectively divided into Russian and Ukrainian. Northern Russian principalities had autonomy as a part of the Golden Horde and rendered tribute to Tatars. In the territory of the Russian principalities there was no mixture of Russians with Tatars, but Tatars took to themselves the Russian girls and guys as a part of a tribute. Among Ukrainians, unlike Russians, it is more dark-haired more with the round head, it is possible because they are to some extent mixed with Turkic Khazars of the people.

�� In 1340 Lithuania captured east Volhynia. In 1349 Poland in the union with Tatars took Galicia and the western Volhynia and for economic development of this territory the Poles invited experts from Germany among whom there were generally Jews. Jews rented the earth which belonged to Poles, and Ukrainians were hired farm laborers. In two centuries the Jews in favorable conditions incredibly bred in Poland and in Ukraine as it was once in Egypt. Ukrainian Jews were descendants of the Jews expelled by Romans from Judea and had nothing in common with Khazar Jews, which by then assimilated among Slavs.

�� In 1569 after the Lublin union which united Poland and Lithuania, all Ukrainian and Belarusian lands become into the of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Thus, all western part of the former Kievan Rus' together with the city of Kiev appeared in the power of Poland and over peasants the Polish feudal lords began to dominate, turning peasants into farm laborers. Being under oppression of the Polish feudal lords, Ukrainians began to run from there in the steppe for thresholds of Dnieper where they created Zaporizhy Sech. ��But Don Cossacks it is generally descendants of the Russian Khazars.

�� In 1648 the Cossacks headed by the hetman Bogdan Khmelnytsky began war against Poland, but in this war defenseless Jews suffered more. Bogdan Khmelnytsky could not achieve independence of Ukrainians of Poland and therefore he in 1654 established the union with Russia, having received some autonomy for Zaporizhy Sech, who protected the southern boundaries of Russia from attacks of Tatars and Turks. Since 1669 Left-bank Ukraine was a part of Russia though was operated by the Ukrainian hetmen. Russia became powerful after accession of Ukraine. And Right-bank Ukraine though remained a part of Poland, but the anarchy reigned there.

�� In 1768 in Right-bank Ukraine the haidamaks (runaway Ukrainian peasants) excited a bloody rebellion against the Polish dominion. Haidamaks differed in pathological hatred to Jews, was destroying the whole of the residence� of Jews, and then destroyed Polan. Where there were haidamaks, there was no living soul left. Russia helped Poland to suppress this revolt, to did not extend to all Ukraine. If Ukrainians did not destroy Jews, then in Ukraine could be Jews not less than Ukrainians, and Kiev would be called New Jerusalem.

�� After Russia subdued the Crimea, the need for the Zaporizhy Sech disappeared, and Catherine II in 1775 liquidated it, therefore Left-bank Ukraine became a part of Russia. In 1795 after the partition of Poland between Russia, Austria and Prussia, the Right-bank Ukraine also turned into structure of Russia, so there was a reunion of east and western parts of Kievan Rus.

�� As from 1349 to 1775 the southwest Russian Slavs and northeast Russian Slavs lived separately in the different states, Old Russian language at them changed into modern Russian, the Ukrainian and Belarusian languages. Russians of Russia (Muscovites) changed the language to a large extent after Christianization. It is interesting that at most of Ukrainians of a surname differ from Russians. But at the правителей и знати of Kiev and Galich of a surname were Russian, same as Polish, with the termination on "skiy", "tskiy". Many Russian surnames was changed on Ukrainian during government of Hetman of Cossacks in Ukraine. Before revolution of 1917 in Ukraine in big cities talked mainly in Russian which was the common state language for all Russia. But residents of villages of Ukraine talk in Ukrainian. It occurred because citizens had more communications with administration of tsarist Russia and there lived many Russians.

�� During the short-term power of the Ukrainian Directory headed by Petliura and Vinnichenko the Ukrainization of Ukraine began. After establishment of the Soviet power in Ukraine the communists even more strengthened the Ukrainization of Ukraine. In 1925 Lazar Kaganovich became the secretary general of the Central Committee of the KPU and he especially is acting in an Ukrainization of Ukraine.� Administrative workers, who could not ukrainizationed quickly, were punished. But, then the Soviet power corrected excesses in an Ukrainization, as such Ukrainization prevented industrialization of the country for which the common state Russian was necessary. But development of Ukrainian in Ukraine was continued. Uniform literary Ukrainian developed in the Soviet period. But Ukrainians of the western Ukraine, being under the power of Poland, had no opportunity to keep the language in purity, as Poland pursued policy of an polishing of Ukrainians. In the western Ukraine the Russian-Polish dialect which considerably differs from Ukrainian in the central Ukraine was formed.

�� After the February revolution of 1917 the Central Rada was created. Mikhail Grushevsky was elected Rada's chairman. Under Rada's decrees Ukraine was autonomy with the parliament, as a part of Russia, and was allowed formation of national Ukrainian army with submission to Provisional government. But, the Provisional government not give to increase in independence of the Central Rada. After the October revolution the Central Rada proclaimed creation of the Ukrainian people's republic as a part of Russia, and in January 1918 UNR proclaimed itself the independent republic, i.e. the certain state and began fight against Bolsheviks against Russia. But, along with it in a month after the October revolution, in Kharkiv proclaimed the Ukrainian People's Republic of Councils, which do outlawed UNR. Under the power of UNR there were only Kiev, Zhytomyr, Poltava and Odessa. In these conditions the Red Army, having suppressed the insignificant resistance of nationalists, easily occupied Kiev which became then the central city of the Ukrainian SSR instead of Kharkiv. In February 1918 the German troops occupied Kiev and forbade the central Rada, instead of UNR was proclaimed the Ukrainian State, led by Skoropadsky. After leaving of Germans Kiev under the terms of the Brest world, in December, 1918 the supporters of UNR overthrew Skoropadsky and in Kiev became the Directoria led by Vinnichenko, and then the military leader Petliura began to govern. In 1918 and 1919 during Civil war Petliura's army was at war against Bolsheviks. At Petliura the Jewish riots in Kiev and other cities and the towns of Ukraine were organized. After the Civil war in Russia and in Ukraine, the Galicia and Volhynia became a part of Poland under the peace treaty.

�� After World War II the Poles were deported to Poland, and Ukrainians from Poland to Ukraine. Ukrainians, Russians and Jews made the greatest contribution to economic and cultural development of the Ukrainian republic and protected these lands from Hitlerite Germany. And earlier, being in structure of tsarist Russia, the Ukrainians and Jews on an equal basis with Russians were at war and perished in World War I, in the Crimean campaign and all other wars, protecting lands, in particular the Crimea. Therefore, all these three peoples - Ukrainians, Russians and Jews are the state-building people of the Ukrainian republic and then independent Ukraine. Jews lived more than 500 years in Ukraine as indigenous people together with Russians, Poles and Ukrainians.

� ��After the collapse of the USSR and transformation of the Ukrainian SSR to independent Ukraine, the national consciousness of Ukrainians is changed, and the unprecedented national patriotism appeared. Ukrainians began to be interested in history of the Ukrainian people. The government began an Ukrainization of Ukraine and to counteract to cultural influence of Russia. Ukrainization of Ukraine did generally by nationalists of the Western Ukraine on the basis of revival of ideology of Grushevsky, Petliura, Bandera and Shukhevich and at the tacit consent of presidents of Ukraine Kravchuk, Kuchma, Yushchenko and Yanukovych which also caught interest in the Ukrainian nationalism. In these conditions the modern Ukrainian nationalists could change consciousness� of people and created the new people.

�� After the collapse of the USSR, Kuchma to remain in power, gave in� to politicians from the western Ukraine who sought to impart the ideology of nationalism and their dialect� ( Ukrainian language in Poland) to all people of Ukraine. They are acting by means of transatlantic sponsors through their educational seminars. Even in Eastern Ukraine many supporters of the nationalist idea appeared. Kuchma did not conduct firm policy, therefore his board in 2004 terminated in "orange revolution" on "Maidan" (a mitingovaniye in the square) with regeneration of Ukraine from Soviet in nationalist. The nationalist Yushchenko, at the connivance of the representative from Russia of Gryzlov became the governor of Ukraine under pressing of the western politicians in negotiations. But, Yushchenko was not a strong nationalist. therefore, on the president's re-elections in 2010 the nationalists did not support Yushchenko, having decided to support Yanukovych temporarily. In 2014 the nationalists by means of the western sponsors organized the second Maidan which became bloody. Yanukovych was stripped of power and after that governors of Ukraine were nationalists who directed development of Ukraine on the way together with European integration, at the same time pursuing Russophobic policy. Before the collapse of the USSR in Ukraine there was no difference between Ukrainians and Russians at their communication, Ukraine was as Russia. The distinction was only in the nationality specified in the passport what did not pay attention to. Even the western Ukraine, annexed to the Ukrainian SSR, very quickly became such as all Ukraine. On the example of Ukraine, it is visible that the nationalism is the strongest idea in comparison with any "humane" universal ideas, such as internationalism, socialism, democracy, etc.

Thanks to skillful free propaganda, modern Banderovites managed to influence youth of all Ukraine because situation in Ukraine now cardinally changed. The Ukrainian people as were changed. The Ukrainian nationalists Banderovites achieved not only prohibitions of the Russian state language in Ukraine, having left only the Ukrainian state language, but also provoked russophobia for rejection of Ukrainians from Russians for creation of the unitary national state which is more viable. Despite the general origin from Kievan Rus', the Ukrainian people any more any more will never identify itself with the Russian people as the new generation of the people who are brought up on new ideology.��

�� 7. ARMAGEDDON AND GOD'S RIGHT HAND

�

�� Modern Israel is created by the European Jews (ashkenaza), the Zionists from tsarist Russia are created the Jewish settlements (ishuv) there. According to the words of God only descendants of a knee of Judas have to return to Judea and inherit the Promised Land: "Kalev, in him there was a spirit other, and he was quite devoted to me, I will bring it into the earth where it went, and the posterity will inherit it it" (Ch. 14:24).

�� Kalev came from a knee of Judas, of which descendants are the European Jews (ashkenaza), generally it is the Russian Jews and the American Jews. In spite of the fact, that in beginning the people of Israel consist of Jews ashkenaz, but because the Jews mix up with mizrakhy, then Israelis represent already new Israeli nation, different from world Jewry of diaspora.

�� Israel any more not that which was during its creation. Now Israel is infected with russophobia, which appeared in Israel after acceptance of Afro-Asian Jews, which suppressed the tolerant ashkenaz, and counteracted to alia the Russian Jews ashkenaz to Israel. Most of old residents of ashkenaz were being afraid of the competition with educated Russian Jews. Such Israel with such policy became non-Jewish and cannot satisfy God, this Israel can be doomed in case of global war in the Middle East.

�� In the 21st century the Middle Eastern conflict and the Ukrainian dilleme turned into global conflict of peoples. The empire of USA consisting of representatives of the different people after the collapse of the USSR have domination in all the human world. In this case there cannot be global wars, but only regional, which the USA will manage. But Russia does not want to be dependent on will of the USA and opposed that.

�� In Ukraine after an exit from the USSR, promotion on alienation from Russia began. When the policy of Ukraine would become completely anti-Russian, it could begin war against Russia with assistance of the West. In this case Russia cannot stand against the West because of advance of NATO to the East. Therefore, Russia without waiting for succession of events attacked Ukraine. This war can be finished, because at its escalation can be used the atomic weapons, which do not ensure a victory of one of the parties but only mutual destruction. Considering it, now it is more important to USA to neutralize China which enhances the nuclear weapons. Other nuclear countries with small nuclear power cannot resist the USA and Russia.

�� Position of the State of Israel, which is in an environment of the Arab states, is difficult. Israel is threatened not only by the Arab countries, but also the non-Arab countries which for domination in the Middle East rely on Islam, general with Arabs. But even not Islamic states are on the party of confrontation to Israel, and towards Jews around the world. Even China decided to interfere with a Middle Eastern question and to benefit, having taken the part on the side of the Arab countries rich with oil. Israel is supported only by the USA and the majority of the European countries. Actually, on the party of Jews the white people, which is called the people of Light, which are countered to the people of Darkness. But, not all European people have such concept.

�� In the Middle East there several parties, which are countering each other. Israel as the God�s people is not in one of axis, and he needs only to hope for God. Israel is under the auspices of the USA now, but whether for a long time. Under the auspices of the USA there are also Arab countries, and these countries have an irresolvable conflict with Israel about the Promised Land (Palestine) on which there is the State of Israel and there live Arabs. The State of Israel will not be able to exist further on a small plot of land in an environment of the enemy states at modern missile weapon with which it is possible to strike all territory of Israel immediately.

�� In such time has to appear the Messiah on the Promised Land. In Iyezekiil's prophecy about it is told: "You the Son of Mankind (Messiah) prophesy about Gog and you will tell that the Lord Eternal told, here I am the God yours. Gog you -Meshekh and Fuval's prince (Turkic peoples and other descendants of Yefet whom also Persians treat). I will lift you from the outskirts of the North and I will bring you on the mountains of Israel. But I will beat out onions you�re from the left your hand and an arrow you�re r from the right your hand. On the mountains of Israel, you will fall and all your groups and the people which are with you, field I will put to birds of prey and animals you at the mercy. Also, I will send fire on Magog (Gog's earth) and to living safely on islands and on continents. Also learn that I am Eternal". (Iyezekiil 39:1-6). Apparently, the people of Israel should use atomic weapons against the people of Darkness. There will be a stuation when also other states are to use atomic weapons. The result of this confrontation is described and in a prophecy of Bilaam, on which Iran and Israel will strongly suffer. For prevention of a nuclear apocalypse Russia will interfere with the Middle Eastern conflict. It is logical as Russia has friendly relations with Iran and as Russia is connected with Israel by great number of compatriots. It is not so simple to resolve this conflict, but Russia can do it, and can become God's right hand.

�� As the State of Israel becomes actually non-Jewish, this state, which is on the Promised Land, contradicts God's Precept. Now the Middle Eastern conflict became complicated so, that it can be resolved only by resettlement of different communities to places of their of former accommodation. It is including the Palestinian Arabs, they have to return to Yemen, there, where is began the Arab wars against the different people. Sefards can return to Spain, and mizrakhy (they are mainly edomites) can return to the Edom, which became a part of Jordan.

�� The European Jews were forced to go to Palestine after Holocaust of the European Jews during World War II. The Russian Jews from the USSR and their relatives (Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians) went to Israel at will of God, and at will of God they can return when the State of Israel is not existing. The most expedient resettlement their it in the Crimea, that was considered by the government of the USSR in the 20th years, but then it was rejected by Stalin. Jews are connected with Russians and Ukrainians equally. To the Crimea also the American Jews will be able to be repatriated, where anti-Semitism and problems for white can increase, if there Civil war begins.

�� In spite of the fact that the USA is a multinational country, is almost impossible Civil war as different ethnic groups are very mixed throughout the territory. Besides, in the USA the white people ceased to feel the superiority over the black for a long time. Now white and black in the USA are among themselves closer than to other ethnic groups. However, in spite of the fact that Jews white people, the attitude towards them another, especially from the black.

�� Civil war can be more likely in the Europe, where was allowed invasion of black foreigners from Asia and Africa. Now they want to be owners in Europe and to remake there life on their concepts. In Russia there cannot be now a Civil war as it was exempted from black foreigners of Central Asia and the Caucasus at the collapse of the USSR. The different religion is not essence of people but only a cover. Tatars, as well as Jews do not differ from Russians. If Russia wins the war against Ukraine, then can be, the Europe unite led by Russia. But Great Britain at the same time will remain in the close union with the USA.��

�� The earth promised Palestine has to become the kingdom of priests of Abrahamic religions and pass under control of Russia and the USA for guarantee of world on the earth. Russia and the USA cannot be at war with each other as they can destroy each other and all mankind. Only friendly partnership between the USA and Russia can provide arms control on all earth and ensure the peace between the different people. But, for partnership between the USA and Russia they have to have the general currency and have equal access to print this currency. But for this purpose in the USA and in Russia, representatives of the people of Christian orientation have to have a power, because elections of power structures it is anarchy. In this case the USA and Russia will together direct the life of mankind, and then there will be a world on the earth. Such life on the earth can last a long time, representing the thousand-year Kingdom of God mentioned in John the Evangelist's prophecy (20.1-6).